Search

band annie's Weblog

I have a parallel blog in French at http://anniebannie.net

Category

Syria

The Kingdom of Silence and Humiliation

Looking back on life under the Assad dynasty.

BY AHED AL HENDI | OCTOBER 16, 2012

They came for me on December 14, 2006. Plainclothes police carrying automatic weapons stormed into an Internet café in Damascus and grabbed me and a friend. They brought us in a car to the headquarters of the Syrian secret police. Around midnight they dragged me from my holding cell to the man I would come to know only as “Captain Wissam.” He was a tall, dark-skinned officer. He looked at me and smiled. “We will release you in just a few minutes,” he said. “You should be a good citizen.” He then called a guard, whom he ordered to “take good care” of me.

Both men spoke with the distinctive accent of the Alawites; in fact, every single person in the prison did. The Alawite minority has effectively ruled Syria since 1963, and especially since President Hafez al-Assad took power in 1970. So when you hear this accent, you pay attention. Ever since I can remember, this has been the way that the people with real power in our country speak

They did not keep me for a few minutes. They threw me into a cell they called “the Suite.” Measuring five feet by one and a half feet, it had no windows. There was a hole in the floor for a toilet and a hose attached to a faucet in the wall. The hose had two purposes: to keep the toilet clean and to provide me with drinking water. They told me I’d be staying for two years.

As it turned out, they let me go in 40 days. But that was more than enough. During that period, which I spent entirely in solitary confinement, I was interrogated constantly. I was tortured repeatedly, both psychologically and physically. (Forgive me, but I would prefer not to go into the details.) Every single day I feared death. When they released me, I staggered out onto the street, bearded and unkempt, wearing the same clothing I had on at the time of my arrest (though now everything was in tatters). Outside, everything seemed to be normal. People in the streets were walking around and enjoying their lives, smiling and laughing.

This was Syria under the Assads. I had drawn the attention of the secret police because of my membership in a student group that set out to publicize the human rights abuses of the regime. To engage in opposition meant questioning not only the government, but the entire version of reality that it had imposed upon us for decades.

Like millions of Syrians, I started my education at the age of six. My first day at school began with a greeting to our “Great Father,” Hafez al-Assad. We sang songs in his praise. His picture was everywhere: in our notebooks, our textbooks, our classrooms, even in the bathroom. He was the one who protected us from the danger of the imperialists and Zionists. He was the one who regained the honor of the Arabs. At school we learned that Assad’s cleverness had enabled Syria to win the Yom Kippur War, and we used to celebrate this day every year by holding up pictures of Assad marking the victory.

What we didn’t know, of course, was that the regime had actually been defeated. They used to tell us that Bill Clinton said that he fears two things: death and Hafez Al-Assad. Once our teacher told us that an agent of a foreign enemy country had tried to assassinate Assad, but when Assad was in range, the agent couldn’t see him on his rifle scope. The teacher told us that the hand of God intervened to stop the killing.

The portraits of the Great Father were always striking. When he smiled on TV, we felt intense love for our wonderful president. I was enrolled in an organization called “The Baath Party Pioneers.” We dressed in uniforms and chanted every morning that we would stand behind our great leader to smash imperialism and Zionism. Just like any normal school kid, I conformed with the rest.

And why wouldn’t I have? We thought of him as a supernatural being, a kind of god. I remember how once, in the fifth grade, we were wondering whether Assad really used the bathroom; the very thought was strange.

My first shock came at age nine. I was sitting next to my father watching the news on state-run TV, the only channel that we had. There was an interview with a Palestinian activist who ran an Arabic newspaper. I was very surprised. “Don’t they live in tents?” I asked my father. “How can they print newspapers? How do the Israelis allow them to do that?” My father was very nervous and quickly replied, “Yes, they can have newspapers, but it’s hard.”

The person being interviewed was harshly critical of the Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin. “Are the Israelis going to throw him in jail, like our neighbor?” I asked. “I don’t know,” my father replied curtly.

My neighbor was a political prisoner who belonged to a leftist movement. His children did not see him for seven years. He was released in 2004. When we asked why he was in prison, my family used to say, “He spoke badly about our Great Father, Hafez Al Assad.”

The puzzle of my neighbor perplexed me. How could a country like Israel, portrayed as a ruthless enemy, tolerate criticism, while my neighbor rotted in prison controlled by the merciful father, Assad?

When Hafez’s son died, the whole country dressed in black. We were not allowed to sing on the school bus due to public mourning. Every single person around me cried when he died. Posters all around us proclaimed that the son, Basil Al Assad, was a martyr. I was in fourth grade at the time, and I asked my teacher: “Didn’t you teach us that martyrs are those who die while fighting the enemy?” “Yes,” my teacher replied. “Then why do you call Basil a martyr when he died in a car accident?” The teacher was irate. She hit me hard and told me to bring my father. Because my school was a private Christian school, the problem was contained and the incident was not reported to state security.

In 2000, Hafez al-Assad died, and was succeeded by his other son, Bashar. There was talk of reforms, but that didn’t amount to anything. One thing did change, though: The omnipresent pictures of Hafez were now joined by new pictures of Bashar. The old personality cult was now transferred to the son.

This was the environment of fear in which I lived until I was 19 years old. That was when I figured out why my neighbor was jailed, why Basil was called a martyr, and why countless people didn’t know the whereabouts of their fathers because they had dared to criticize the regime. I learned about many of these things through the Internet, which exposed me to a range of information I wouldn’t have had otherwise.

Some friends and I founded a group that we called “Syrian Youth for Justice.” We tried to raise awareness about human rights abuses and to counter the pro-Assad Islamic and national sentiments that were flourishing on our college campus. Activists associated with Hezbollah were openly allowed to recruit students and conduct propaganda. Those, like us, who supported the cause of secularism and democracy were arrested and imprisoned. Some of my friends were sentenced to terms of five or seven years in jail.

Unsurprisingly, many in Syria blamed me and a small group of activists rather than the Assad dictatorship. The state had conditioned people to associate activism with treason. As a result, most people treated activists as dupes or spies of foreign powers. Many of my friends refused to talk to me after I was released, and some of my relatives were even afraid to call and make sure that I was safe. But I knew Syria was a kingdom of silence and humiliation. I never expected the waves of the Arab Spring to reach the Syrian beach.

After my release, I fled from Syria, and lived in Jordan, Egypt, and Lebanon. After a while I was granted refugee status and came to the United States of America. I will never forget the email I got from Alyssa Teach, a political officer at the American embassy in Lebanon in 2008. “Hi, Ahed, are you still in Lebanon? Please let me know if everything is ok with you.” Since the Syrian government was trying to find me, the American embassy in Beirut was helping me with my papers to apply for refugee status. She was worried that the pro-Syrian groups in Lebanon could get to us, particularly since Assad did not like the idea of an opposition presence in Lebanon.

That email may look normal to many, but for a young man who was raised to hate America and consider it the greatest enemy of the world, it was an incredible feeling. I was hiding from the regime of the “Great Father,” while the “Great Enemy” was checking in on me and helping me.

I never expected that my fellow Syrians would rebel. Now they haven’t only rebelled, they are fighting to the death without fear. Tens of thousands have been killed and yet young men will protest, fight the regime, and refuse to give up. Not everyone has been brainwashed. One of the first things that the protestors did was to destroy the omnipresent images of the two Assads — a signal that the end of the regime is near. As far as most Syrians are concerned, the end can’t come soon enough.

source

Long cultivated by Assad, Syria’s business elite feels squeeze of war, sanctions

  • By Associated Press, Published: October 17
    CAIRO — Syria’s wealthy, long cultivated by President Bashar Assad as a support for his regime, are seeing their businesses pummeled by the bloody civil war. Factories have been burned down or damaged in fighting. International sanctions restrict their finances. Some warn that their companies are in danger of going under, worsening the country’s buckling economy.Assad may not have lost the backing of Syria’s business elite, but some are losing faith. Many of those who can have fled abroad, hoping to ride out the turmoil, which is now in its 19th month and is only getting worse as rebels and regime forces tear apart the country in their fight for power.

    Several businessmen interviewed by The Associated Press say resentment is growing against Assad over the crisis — but they also aren’t throwing their lot in with the rebellion. They are hunkering down, trying to salvage their companies.full article here

Meeting a rebel commander in Aleppo

By Ian PannellBBC News, Aleppo

(File photo) A Syrian rebel in AleppoAleppo is becoming a defining battle in the Syrian conflict

Since the conflict in Syria began 18 months ago, more and more civilians have been drawn into the fighting – and in Aleppo I met a businessman whose experience of torture in custody has turned him into a determined rebel commander.

“The question shouldn’t be ‘Were we tortured?’ it should be ‘When weren’t we?'”

Dr Abdul Raouf used to be part of Aleppo’s successful and wealthy business elite.

But as the Syrian revolution started to grip the country he turned his attention to politics, meeting secretly with others to call for change.

That was when he was arrested.

I met three members of his secret group on the outskirts of Aleppo this week.

Syria’s second city has gone from being a bystander in a growing protest movement, to the key battleground in a vicious civil war.

What drives these men is the six months they spent in the hands of the feared Air Force Intelligence unit.

“Let’s start with Al Khazouk,” says Dr Raouf.

He went on to describe this particular form of torture, which involved having a stick forced into him.

The other men nodded.”Every Syrian knows what Al Khazouk is,” they agreed.

He then demonstrated having electrical wires attached to his chest and genitals. He talked about the beatings, having his ribs broken.

These methods appear to be so frighteningly common that the way they described them was almost casual.

In fact, between swirls of smoke from the doctor’s pipe, the men joked and chuckled while telling the most horrific stories.

But at one point he lost his temper, jabbing the air with his finger, crying, “Wallahi” – “I swear to God”.

He was describing being forced to watch a woman prisoner being raped in front of him and being told by the guards, “We’ll do this to your wife unless you tell us what we want to know.”

Dr Raouf said that before they were arrested, the group had long discussions about whether they should get some sticks to defend themselves during protests.

“But when we were released, we decided to buy every weapon we could afford,” he said.

Today the civil protest movement has become a civil war in which as many as 30,000 people have been killed, according to opposition activists.

The violence has continued to escalate with September being the bloodiest month so far. Desperate times have bred desperate men.

We were sitting in front of one rebel base in the south when a fighter jet roared overhead.

We went around the back of the building to try to film the plane.

Several fighters were gathered there and they eyed us suspiciously.

“Who are you? What are you doing here?” they asked.

This was a tight-knit group that kept itself apart from the others.

Some had long beards and flowing robes, a few appeared to be foreigners and they were clearly unhappy to see foreign journalists.

We were escorted back to the front of the building where we were told we should not film the men, not even talk to them.

We discovered later that this was Jabhat al-Nusra, a radical group of armed jihadis suspected by some of having links to al-Qaeda. They claim to have carried out a number of large-scale bombings across Syria.

There are no reliable figures for how many members they have, nor how many extremists and foreign jihadis have entered Syria altogether.

Some estimate they make up as much as 10% of rebel fighters in Aleppo.

In reality there are probably just a few hundred of them but they operate in the most dangerous areas. They use the uncompromising tactics of militant groups elsewhere and their numbers are growing.

Syrian's state news agency (SANA) issued this photo of this building torn apart by a bombing in a government-controlled district of Syria's commercial capital, AleppoAt least 34 people were killed and dozens injured in a series of bomb explosions

While we were in Aleppo there was a series of massive co-ordinated bomb attacks against government buildings that left dozens of people dead and many more injured. Jabhat al-Nusra said they did it.

“The Islamist groups are helping us get our rights while the West is just watching,” says Dr Raouf.

He has made a pact with the militants and believes they will accept a secular, democratic government and lay down their weapons when the conflict is over.

Some may be sceptical of that.

The doctor then left to visit his men on the frontlines.

Commanders on both sides are now actively targeted for assassination and what he did not know was that someone was tracking his vehicle. Someone wanted him dead.

As he drove on to an open stretch of road, a fighter jet moved in and opened fire on his car leaving him badly wounded.

The West chose not to arm the Syrian opposition for fear of the consequences.

But in many ways the worst of what it sought to avoid has come to pass anyway – massive displacement of civilians, spiralling violence, a significant loss of life, a radicalised opposition and an influx of foreign fighters.

Moderate voices face increased competition.

And the longer it has gone on, the bloodier and more extreme the conflict has become and the greater the threat it poses to an already fragile region.

source

In Praise of Hatred, By Khaled Khalifa, trans. Leri Price

This novel of repression and subversion in Syria explores the lure of fanaticism

Saturday 15 September 2012

Khaled Khalifa’s third novel was banned on publication in Syria, even though its political turbulence never arrives in the present day but focuses on the decade following 1970, when the Muslim Brotherhood became locked in deadly battle with the state’s Baathist party. The battle ended in 1982, in an attempted uprising by the Brotherhood which the government crushed in Hama, levelling parts of the city and leaving between 10,000 and 25,000 people (mainly civilians) dead or wounded in a singularly brutal intervention.

Neither the Muslim Brotherhood nor the Baath is mentioned by name in the novel, but it is clear what Khalifa’s points of references are, and also why this book was seen as a threat to the current beleaguered regime. Historians might trace a line from the troubles that erupted around Aleppo in the Seventies to the conflict on its streets today.

An unnamed female narrator is the central fanatic of the story. That Khalifa has chosen to profile fanaticism from a feminine perspective, rather than the more predictable “male martyr”, is this book’s great innovation. It is a courageous endeavour with sometimes exhilarating, sometimes off-key results.

Religious fanaticism offers the narrator the “pleasure of absolute certainty” and to fan its fires, she must mobilise her capacity for hate. The veiled young woman, growing up in the cloistered environment of her grandparents’ home, excels at cultivating hate, which comes to feel as passionate and purposeful a force as love. At one point, “I realised hatred was worthy of praise, as it lives within us exactly as love does. It grows moment by moment in order to settle finally into our souls, and we don’t want to escape it even when it causes us pain.” Even when she finds herself imprisoned, there is a peculiar sisterhood of hate between the incarcerated women.

Her religious fervour is pitted against an erotic awakening and these two also do battle until the end. She gives in to the thrill of her emerging sexuality and her – sometimes lesbian – carnal impulses, but then pulls away and berates her weakness. Khalifa writes compellingly about this troubled eroticism in parts, but strays into clumsy contrivance or hyperbole at other times.

While the story is ostensibly a domestic one about the narrator and her wealthy household of aunts who must choose between a life of self-denying spinsterhood or rebellious marriage, at its core it is about violence: the religiously motivated violence of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the counter-violence inflicted by a secular government. The two forces are locked into a mutual cycle of hatred, each atrocity sparking the next.

Khalifa is said to have spent 13 years working on the book, a finalist for the International Prize for Arabic Fiction. “The main thing I wanted to get at was the struggle of two fundamentalisms,” he has said. The novel captures not just the tragedy in this, but the self-defining “heroism” for those willing to live and die for their cause.

source

Syrian refugees in Hatay, Turkey

Aref Dalila: Negotiation is Forbidden

Syrian opposition figure Aref Dalila (C) attends the opening session of “The National Conference for Syria Salvation” in Damascus 23 September 2012. (Photo: Khaled al-Hariri)

By: Marah Mashi

Published Thursday, October 11, 2012

Syrian opposition veteran Dalila tells Al-Akhbar that the regime is as unserious about dialogue with its home-based critics as it ever was, despite allowing some to hold a conference in Damascus.

Damascus – Aref Dalila, the veteran opposition figure and member of the National Coordination Committee for Democratic Change in Syria (NCC), has no time for those who use the latter epithet merely to try to absolve themselves of responsibility for the crisis.

 

“If there really is a conspiracy, as claimed, you have to ask why those who hold to the idea of a conspiracy did not prepare in advance to counter it and safeguard against it,” he remarks. There are indeed conspiracies being played out in Syria, he says, by individuals “who seek to serve their personal interests and acquire more of what they do not deserve.” But the crisis in the country is an “objective phenomenon,” and the blame for it lies with the regime, which “created conditions that enable every possible conspiracy and plot to be hatched.” 

Dalila draws parallels with the former Soviet Union, where “the suppression of freedom of opinion enabled corruption to become endemic, leading to its internal collapse without any external aggression.”

What we are witnessing today is “a mixture of a revolution, an armed insurgency, and a conspiracy,” says the economist and former political prisoner, “but primarily it is a revolutionary movement. It is a continuation of the long struggle of the Syrian people…. against corruption and for change and political and economic reform,” which has always been countered with “savage repression” by the authorities.

So why has it been unsuccessful? “The reason the struggle in Syria has not been resolved is because the regime acted to militarize it,” he affirms.

Full article here

From the FT : Syrian massacre veiled in silence

From the Financial Times: Syrian massacre is veiled in silence

The killings in Daraya by regime forces attracted worldwide condemnation at the time – but there have been few words and little action since…

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/1dd947a2-10a3-11e2-a5f7-00144feabdc0.html#axzz28ruEDmWT

A tribute to Meshal Temo تحية الى مشعل تمو

[youtube http://youtu.be/v4D5Np2saX4?]

Mechal Temo, a Syrian Kurdish leader, Mechal was assassinated by the Syrian regime Security Forces, during his funeral in Amuda district, a statue of Havez al Assad was brought down to ground and demonstrators raised Mechal’s casket in its place before burial.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑