Search

band annie's Weblog

I have a parallel blog in French at http://anniebannie.net

Tag

Zachary Foster

Israel’s Support for Apartheid, War Crimes and Genocide Around the World, a Brief History

PALESTINE NEXUS /ZACHARY FOSTER

audio version on spotify

For decades, Israel has supplied weapons and military technology to the world’s most brutal military regimes. This is a brief history of Israel’s support for apartheid, atrocities, war crimes and genocide around the world. 

Chile

In the 1970s-80s, Israel supplied arms to Chile’s Augusto Pinochet during its 17-year long military rule in which civilians were routinely targeted, tortured, and disappeared. The Israeli military trained the Chilean secret service, the DINA, described by the CIA in 1974 as a “Gestapo-type police force,” which tortured at least 35,000 and disappeared over 3,000 people. Meanwhile, Israel maintained excellent relations with Chile throughout Pinochet’s rule, sponsoring Chilean leaders on many state visits.

Now, an Israeli-Chilean family seeks justice for their father, who was tortured and killed by the dictatorship. They have sued the Attorney General to open investigations into the involvement of Israeli government institutions in arms deals with Pinochet. The Israeli lawyer and human rights activist Eitay Mack has filed a series of freedom of information petitions for the release of documents that would detail the nature of Israel’s involvement. “The human rights issue is not part of the consideration of the officials in the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, unless there is big public pressure on them,” Mack said. Israeli leaders are unconcerned with how the weapons are used so long as they improve Israel’s diplomatic ties abroad.

Guatemala

In 1977, Israel became Guatemala’s principal weapons supplier, providing the country’s authoritarian leaders with $6 million worth of Galil rifles and Uzi submachine guns. Israel also supplied spyware and electronic surveillance and designed and operated the radar system at Guatemala City’s international airport. Guatemalan officials have even bragged their soldiers carry Israeli weapons and underwent training from Israeli soldiers. Guatemalan leaders have also embraced Israeli military tactics, such as using the theoretical presence of guerilla forces in an area as a pretext to indiscriminately kill civilians. During the civil war, right wing supporters of the regime even spoke about the “Palestinianization” of Guate’s indigenous population.

Then, in 1982, Israeli officials helped Guatemala’s Efraín Ríos Montt carry out a military coup. Montt, who later thanked over 300 Israeli advisors for their help in the takeover, ruled during the bloodiest period of Guatemala’s civil war — known as the Mayan genocide or the Silent Holocaust. In 30 years, over 200,000 Mayan people were killed, tortured, and disappeared. Montt’s rule lasted from 1982-83 during which time his regime disappeared some 70,000 people.

South Africa

In the 1970s and 1980s, Israel became one of apartheid South Africa’s most important arms suppliers. In 1988, South Africa saved Israel’s cash-starved defense industry after it purchased 60 Kfir combat planes for $1.7 billion. Israel was then able to launch a reconnaissance satellite that was only made possible after the weapons sales to the apartheid regime.

South Africa operated an apartheid state, a racist legal system that segregated social and civil life in South Africa, privileging the white minority and condemning the Black majority. Apartheid security forces killed between 11,000 and 21,000 people and detained more than 80,000 people without trial over the course of the regime’s four decades of rule. Today, South Africa continues to suffer from the ramifications of apartheid rule.

Serbia

In 1991, Israel made one of the largest arms deals with Serbia during the Bosnian Genocide,  concealing the weapons transfers in violation of a UN arms embargo that same year. Israel’s military relationship with Serbia continued through at least 1995, with Serbian soldiers having received covert Israeli training in Greece and toting Israeli Uzis, snipers, shells and missiles. In 2016, the Israeli Supreme Court declined to release documents despite a petition filed by Mack and others because it would pose a risk to Israeli foreign relations.  To this day the extent of Israeli support for the Bosnian genocide remains unknown.

The Serbian wars waged against Muslims in Bosnia and Croatia after the dissolution of Yugoslavia have been described as the most egregious acts of ethnic cleansing “Europe had seen since the Holocaust.” Between 1991 and 1995 over 250,000 people were killed, and many more injured, raped, and held in concentration camps.

Rwanda

Israel provided arms to Hutu government forces during the Rwandan Genocide. Israeli weapons manufacturing companies sent 7 shipments of bullets, rifles and grenades to Rwanda between April and July 1994 alone despite an international arms embargo. In 2014, human rights lawyer Mack, alongside others, once again petitioned for documents on the arms trade but were denied because the information might harm “Israel’s state security and foreign relations.”

In 1994, Hutu militias killed more than half a million Tutsis in Rwanda in less than 100 days. It was the culmination of decades of tension between Rwanda’s majority ruling ethnic group, the Hutus, and the Tutsi minority. In total, over 1 million people perished in what is considered to be the fastest genocide in human history.

The Philippines

Israel supplied weapons to the Philippines during President Rodrigo’s Duterte’s infamous drug war in which government forces and death squads killed over 12,000 people. Philippine Security forces carried out the executions with Israeli rifles and handguns in largely poor, urban neighborhoods of the country.

In a 2018 visit to Israel, Duterte openly acknowledged that he favored purchasing Israeli weapons because there are virtually no restrictions on the sales while boastfully comparing himself to Hitler. In 2016, Duterte ran on a presidential campaign promising to kill 100,000 people in his first six months in office. He won by a landslide.

Myanmar

Since 2018, Israeli companies have supplied at least four shipments of weapons to the military junta in Myanmar, including patrol boats, advanced radar systems, air combat maneuvering instrumentation and drones.

Israel Aerospace Industries and Elbit Systems, for instance, continued pre-existing trade relations with the regime, ignoring both an international arms embargo and a 2017 Israeli Supreme Court ban. Israel’s government claimed it had stopped sending weapons to Myanmar in 2018, but arms shipments continued as late as 2022, after the junta overthrew the country’s democratically elected leaders a year earlier. In addition, Israel CAA Industries sold millions worth of arms-manufacturing equipment to Myanmar while an Israeli cyber firm supplied the country with spyware to surveil civilian populations.

In 2017, Israeli weapons and equipment were used to carry out a genocide of Rohingya Muslims. That year, Myanmar’s military Junta killed 9,000 Rohingya between August and September alone, with over 500,000 having fled to Bangladesh.

South Sudan

An Israeli general has been accused of trafficking $150 million worth of arms to the South Sudanese government under the guise of an agricultural firm. Israel provided assault rifles and operated surveillance equipment that has been used to target journalists and opposition figures. This was in spite of a 2018 UN Security Council arms embargo, a 2015 UN Report detailing Israeli violations of a previous ban of weapon sales and Israel’s ongoing promises since 2011 to suspend transfers of lethal equipment.

Years of political unrest and conflict between ethnic and militia groups in South Sudan have culminated in what some say is the “biggest hunger crisis” in recent history. Since 2018, some 400,000 people have been killed due to violence, starvation and disease, and between 4 and 11 million people have been displaced.

Azerbaijan

Israel has sold billions of dollars worth of arms to Azerbaijan since 2012. The Azerbaijani military even published videos displaying Israeli missiles and suicide drones and a factory producing these drones on Azeri soil. Meanwhile, the government has also used the Israeli company NSO’s spyware to target journalists and opposition activists.

In 2023, Azerbaijani forces continued to use Israeli arms to institute a 9-month blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh after decades of fighting that had left tens of thousands dead. They starved out the region’s 120,000 ethnic Armenians, blocking access to food, medicine, and fuel until January 24, 2024 when Azerbaijani forces ethnically cleansed the last remaining Armenians in the beleaguered enclave.

——

Israeli arms dealers have been intimately involved in many of the world’s most horrific acts of violence over the past half-century. In addition to the cases cited above, Israel has also reportedly supplied weapons to Argentina, Venezuela, Equatorial Guinea, and Nicaragua. In each of these cases as well, Israeli arms have been used to carry out atrocities. The Israeli firm Pegasus is also distributing its spyware to authoritarian states, where the technology will almost certainly be used to crack down on journalists and opposition figures.

Israeli human rights lawyer Mack emphasizes that the sales are intended to boost Israel’s diplomatic standing in the world. “In my opinion, economic incentive should never be above the moral issues and the human rights issues.”

yt  

Meet the Palestinian Hostages Taken by Israel, Known as “Administrative Detainees”

March 22, 2024   |   Read Online
 Zachary Foster
Meet the Palestinian Hostages Taken by Israel, Known as “Administrative Detainees”Meet Omar al-Khatib, a research partner at The Institute of Development Studies, affiliated with the University of Sussex in Brighton, UK.
Omar al-Khatib, a Palestinian hostage abducted by Israel (source)On 1 March 2024, Omar was taken hostage by Israel. He was not charged with anything. He was not told why he was taken to prison, nor why his imprisonment could be renewed forever.Omar’s colleagues described him as empathic, passionate and brilliant. Omar was robbed of his freedom and will likely be subjected to untold abuses such as harassment, assault, solitary confinement, torture, sexual abuse or possibly worse: at least 7 Palestinian prisoners have mysteriously “died” in Israel’s custody since Oct. 7th. 
So why was Omar taken hostage? In all likelihood, he will be leveraged as a bargaining chip in hostage negotiations with Hamas. In other words, he was taken for the same reason that Hamas took Israeli civilians hostage on Oct. 7th, as leverage in a prisoner swap.
But there is at least one key difference between Israel’s actions and Hamas’s actions: Hamas took a few hundred civilians hostage on Oct. 7th, while Israel has taken 3,558 civilians hostage, and continues to take more hostages every day.In fact, the 3,558 Palestinians taken hostage includes only those known as “administrative detainees,” the term Israel uses to whitewash its policy of hostage taking. [This figure does not include an additional 5,519 Palestinian prisoners, classified as “Security Prisoners”, “Security Detainees” or  “Unlawful Combatants”]
The phrase “administrative detainee” typifies the sanitizing language that has become a hallmark of Western media coverage of Israel’s genocidal war on the people of Gaza. Palestinians aren’t killed, but they do seem to die a lot; they aren’t attacked, although there are a lot of explosions, and they definitely aren’t hostages, they are administrative detainees.Meet Diala Ayesh, a Palestinian human rights lawyer. On Jan. 17th, Israel took Diala hostage.
Diala Ayesh, a Palestinian hostage abducted by Israel (source)Much like Omar, Diala was not charged with anything nor told why she was taken to prison, nor explained why she could be imprisoned forever without ever getting an answer about what she did wrong.“Whenever I cry at night in bed…I try to remember how extremely strong she is,” her 26-year-old sister, Aseel, told Al Jazeera. Diala’s abduction appears to have been designed to maximize the number of Palestinian lives destroyed via “administrative detention.”
That’s because Diala was herself a lawyer defending the rights of other Palestinians abducted by Israel. In fact, she not only defended Palestinian abductees, she was training other lawyers in how to defend Palestinian administrative detainees in Israel’s military courts. For Israel, if there are fewer lawyers to defend the Palestinian hostages, and fewer lawyers to train other lawyers to defend the Palestinian hostages, there will be fewer impediments to taking more Palestinians hostage.Israel’s policy of abducting Palestinians, unsurprisingly, goes back many decades:
Source: B’tselem
Today, Israel is currently holding 3X more Palestinian hostages than at any point in the past two decades, a policy that relies on a simple principle. If you are an Israeli living in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, you are entitled to due process, but if you are a Palestinian living in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, you are not entitled to due process.No surprise that this what-the-fuck policy has triggered the most visceral and self-sacrificial form of resistance: hunger strikes.For decades, Palestinians denied basic due process have been at the forefront of the hunger protests
In May 2023, Khader Adnan died in his prison cell after he went on a hunger strike protesting his imprisonment. Adnan had been arrested at least 12 times in the past and spent around eight years in prison, mostly in “administrative detention.” This was the fifth and final time he was to go on a hunger strike.In Dec. 2021, Israel abducted Khalil Awawdeh, a Palestinian father of four who went on a six-month hunger strike in 2022 until Israel agreed to release him–pressing no further charges against him.It’s time to regard Israel’s policy of hostage taking for what it is, hostage taking.

How AIPAC is Making the US Congress pro-Genocide

February 23, 2024   |   Read Online

Zachary Foster

listen to audio

AIPAC, or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Israel’s lobby in the United States, will deploy $100M this campaign season to help elect pro-genocide candidates to the US Congress. That makes AIPAC the largest single-issue spender in the primaries.

For AIPAC, priority #1 is to unseat the most vocal critics of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. Target #1 has been MI-Democratic Representative Rashida Tlaib, Congress’s most outspoken advocate for Palestinian human rights. AIPAC offered a whopping $20 million to both Hill Harper and Nasser Beydoun to run against her in the 2024 Democratic primary, a fifth of AIPAC’s entire war chest.

Both Harper and Beydoun balked at AIPAC’s offer, and both leaked the dollar amount they were offered, apparently to dissuade others from taking the blood money. It was harder than AIPAC realized to compell a Democrat from Arab Detroit to accept $20M to support a plausible genocide of the Palestinians. Who would have guessed?

AIPAC has had more success in their attempt to unseat NY-Democratic Representative Jamaal Bowman, one of the few U.S. lawmakers calling for a ceasefire. AIPAC recruited pro-Israel stalwart George Latimer to run against Bowman in the Democratic primary, giving Latimer more than $600,000 or a some 42% of his entire campaign budget. After AIPAC, Bowman’s next largest contributor was Bradley Tusk, who gave the maximum of $6,600.

That brings us to AIPAC’s attempt to oust MO-Democratic Representative Cori Bush, the lead sponsor of a House resolution pushing President Biden to call for a ceasefire. This has been AIPAC’s most impressive success story to date. Wesley Bell, their hand-picked pro-genocide candidate to take out Bush, was beating her by 22% in a Feb. 7-9 poll of 401 likely 2024 Democratic primary voters.

AIPAC is also trying to bring an end to the PA-Democratic Representative Summer Lee’s political career. Bhavini Patel seems to have been recruited to this end, although Patel has not acknowledged it publicly. However, in Dec 2022, the Jewish Insider reported that Patel had been “tentatively eyed by some pro-Israel advocates in Pittsburgh as a potential challenger to Lee next cycle,” according to a person “familiar with the matter.”

For Patel, the AIPAC money is already paying back dividends, as she recently published photos on her Instagram attending pro-Israel rallies. In Feb 2024, Patel told her supporters on a fundraising call that she could help take down the progressive Squad by leveraging support from right-wing Hindu and pro-Israel supporters. A marriage of convenience, apparently.

For decades, AIPAC has been on a mission to engineer a pro-Israel, pro-apartheid and now, awkwardly, a pro-genocide US Congress.

In the 2022 midterms, for example, AIPAC spent $30M on candidates to ensure their support for billions every year in unconditional military aid to Israel, even though that meant supporting 109 U.S. House of Representative members who voted to overturn the 2020 election.

For AIPAC, the end of American democracy is apparently a price worth paying if it means the continuation of Jewish supremacy in Israel and Palestine.

Recall that, in 2012, AIPAC helped Hakeem Jeffries defeat Charles Barron in a 2012 Democratic seat for Congress with at least $475K in donations. In true fashion, AIPAC and Jeffries accused Barron of antisemitism for having described Gaza as a concentration camp.

Today, Hakeem Jeffries is the Democratic House minority leader and opposes placing any conditions at all on the billions of dollars sent to the Israeli military every year, something he emphasized in an interview on February 4th, 2024. That makes Jeffries directly complicit with Israel’s genocidal acts in Gaza.

AIPAC’s power and influence over the US Congress has meant that many of our elected representatives enter politics for the sole reason that they are willing to keep quiet about Israeli war crimes. The result has been that a tiny group of people, representing a tiny minority of US citizens have been and continue to engineer US Congressional support for a plausible genocide.

The Unspoken Rule About Zionism Was Broken

Do Zionism quietly, discreetly, under the cover of darkness.

Author

Zachary Foster
February 09, 2024

The Unspoken Rule About Zionism Was Broken

For more than a century, Zionists have understood that the Zionist project involved doing some unpleasant things, and it was best to keep quiet about those things.

Theodor Herzl realized this as early as 1891. He confided in his diary that “we must expropriate gently the private property on the estates assigned to us” and “we shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border,” adding that “the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly.” [Emphasis added].

The State of Israel has broken the unspoken rule. Israeli soldiers have been publishing videos of themselves blowing up dozens of residential neighborhoods in Gaza. Jewish Israeli leaders have been publicly declaring their intention to ethnically cleanse Gaza while Jewish Israeli journalists have been calling on the military to flatten the entire Strip. Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu himself likened Israel’s enemy to Amalek twice, Amalek being the people the Biblical Israelites were instructed to commit a genocide against.

Of course, not all pro-war Israelis have forgotten the rule. The Israeli judge appointed to the ICJ by Israel, Aharon Barak, voted in support of South Africa’s claim about incitement to genocide. For Barak, the problem was not what Israel was doing, the problem was what Israeli leaders were saying. They were violating the unspoken rule about Zionism. When removing Palestinians from their homes, and making it impossible for them to return, best to do it discreetly.

The Zionist leader Jacob Thon (1880-1950), who worked at the Palestine Land Development Co. buying up land from Arabs in the 1910s, believed that “of course” transferring the Arabs to Transjordan was desirable. But, Thon warned, if the Zionists talked about transfer openly their chances of accomplishing it would diminish. Any steps to “transfer” Arabs would have to be taken “privately.”

During the 1920s, Israel Zangwill (1864-1926) frequently wrote and spoke openly of the removal of the Palestinian Arab population of Palestine. In his view, that was necessary to establish a Jewish democratic state, and so Palestinian Arabs often cited Zangwill’s writings as evidence of Zionism’s nefarious aims. Zionist leaders learned an important lesson from Zangwill’s frankness: “under no circumstances should they talk as though the Zionist program required the expulsion of the Arabs, because this would cause the Jews to lose the world’s sympathy,” in Tom Segev’s words.

Golda Meir also understood the importance of doing things quietly. By 1971, Israeli ministers were going on media roadshows in their newly established settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. The Geneva Conventions of 1948 prohibit states from transferring their civilian population onto land occupied in war, something obvious to Meir but apparently not her ministers. “Before we move forward with our discussion,” Meir said at the outset of a 1971 cabinet meeting, “there’s something I’d like to ask. It was our habit that for anything that has to do with settlements, outposts, land expropriations and so on, we simply do and do not talk [about it].”

Until recently, the Israeli government appreciated the importance of doing the expulsions and the expropriations quietly. For more than a decade, Israeli archivists have been scouring the Israeli archives on a hunt for documents related to the expulsion of Palestinians from their homes. Hundreds of documents have been concealed in “a systematic effort to hide evidence of the Nakba,” or Israel’s ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians in 1948.​

Israelis have generally understood that, whenever the matter pertains to removing Palestinians from their homes, or settling Jews in those homes, the actions must be done quietly to avoid attention. That’s why, in November 2020, Israel chose US Presidential election day to carry out its largest forced displacement in over four years, making 73 Palestinians in Khirbet Humsa homeless. That’s also why Israeli Jewish settlers usually take over Palestinian homes in the middle of the night (123456). Incidentally, that’s also why Israel bombs Gaza at night. That’s also why Israel does not allow foreign journalists to enter Gaza and why journalists native to Gaza are so often targeted. They are giving a voice to what Israel doesn’t want you to hear, and they are shining a light on what Israel doesn’t want you to see.

Perhaps Zionism should embrace a new slogan. Do Zionism quietly, discreetly, under the cover of darkness.

Keep reading

"There is no moral equivalency between Israel & Hamas."

“There is no moral equivalency between Israel & Hamas.”

source

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑