The Prince of Wales described the “horror” of Syria’s refugee crisis today as he visited a camp in Jordan for those who have fled the bloody civil war.
The Prince and the Duchess of Cornwall met victims of torture and families torn apart by the conflict who begged them to “Help us.”
The Duchess described the refugees’ plight as “harrowing” after hearing their stories during the visit to the King Abdullah Park refugee camp seven miles from the Syrian border.
It is home to 1,200 of the 440,000 Syrian refugees who have poured into Jordan over the past two years, and houses less than 24 hours’ worth of new arrivals in the country.
The Royal couple dropped in on one of the families living in prefabricated huts in the camp, where Naim, 55 (who did not want to give his surname for fear of reprisals) told the Prince he had been tortured.
“I was arrested twice in 2011 because I write poetry against the [Assad] regime,” he said. “They put out cigars and cigarettes on my body and arms.
“They would tie me up and blindfold me and started doing things to my body.”
He fled his village near the southern Syrian border with his wife and five children in July.
The Prince asked him: “Do you see any end to this horror?”
He replied: “It is with you. You have the solution. The Syrian people are everybody’s problem.” He added: “Help us.”
The Prince said: “Many of these children have been traumatised by the horrors of what they’ve witnessed before they got here.
“Some of them have lost their parents and had horrendous experiences and it is remarkable what all these wonderful [aid agencies] are doing to deal with this unbelievable and heartbreaking situation.”
He praised the “truly remarkable” generosity of the Jordanians, but said: “It’s putting more and more strain on food and hospitals, so clearly the Jordanians need more assistance and help to be able to cope with this immense challenge. It’s a desperate situation.”
The couple also visited a therapy session where children aged six to 14 are given help to overcome the trauma they have lived through by drawing happy memories of home to give them hope for the future.
Noraman, 13, who lost her father and two brothers when her village of Mahaja was attacked, drew apple and orange trees and told the Duchess: “This is the garden I remember in my house but I’m not sure it will be there when I get back.”
In the garden she drew were a flag of Syria and a flag of Jordan, reflecting her uncertain future.
Emira, 12, does not know if her father is alive or dead and said: “I’m not sure if I will see him again. My mother sometimes says he is dead and sometimes says he is in prison.”
Sava Mobaslat, 41, the programme director for Save the Children in Jordan, said the 600 children at the camp are bussed to local schools to continue their education but go to the children’s centre every day for therapy sessions.
“It is aimed at building coping mechanisms and providing resilience,” she said. “We use drawing, drama, music and arts as an alternative form of expression through which they can express their anxiety and frustration to help them get over it.
“They draw guns, bodies, a lot of red to begin with and gradually they go back to drawing the garden in their back yard.
“The time frame for their recovery varies from child to child, it takes longer for someone who has witnessed the death of a parent or sibling. We have one girl who was walking to school and saw it bombed with her siblings inside and it took her a long time to get over that image.”
After meeting women making knitted goods to raise money for the camp, the Duchess said: “Seeing all these children, some of whom have lost their parents and been adopted by others, I feel it’s quite heartbreaking.
“Some of their stories are so harrowing, but what I find so remarkable is their strength of spirit and the way they are so cheerful despite their circumstances.
“I think that is women for you. They have got their children to look after, they have to survive.
“But to think that many of them don’t even know whether their husbands are alive or dead…it is just awful.”
King Abdullah Park does not compare in scale to the Zaatari camp nearby which has 146,000 people in it, but security concerns meant the Royal couple could not go to the larger camp.
Andrew Harper, the humanitarian coordinator in Jordan for the UN High Commission for Refugees, said: “The desperation of the people in Syria is rising and we are not seeing any indications that the situation is going to get better any time soon.”
A million people have already fled Syria for neighbouring countries and Jordan alone could have a million within its borders by the end of 2013.
Mr Harper said: “I still think we are at the preliminary stages of a mass migration from Syria to Jordan.
“Jordan can’t continue to take hundreds of thousands or a million with nice words from the international community.
“We need significant support and investment. We are all running out of money. People expect us to do the impossible and we are facing a looming disaster.”
Later the Prince and the Duchess visited Jerash, one of the best-preserved Roman cities in the world, where they were given a guided tour of the streets, temples and amphitheatre.
March 12, 2013
By Redac_MM
“My computer was shut down before me.” This is the clear observation of a Syrian activist arrested and tortured by the regime of Bashar al-Assad. Caught in the nets of online monitoring, Karim Taymour tells a reporter from Bloomberg [1] have been present during his interrogation a stack of more than 1000 pages detailing his conversations and electronic files exchanged on Skype. His executioners knew clearly much of it as they were found in his room, or rather his computer.
Online monitoring is a growing danger for journalists, bloggers, citizen journalists and human rights. In 2011, WikiLeaks made public the Spyfiles, documents showing the extent of the surveillance market and the financial burden it represents (over $ 5 billion), and the sophistication of the products offered.
Traditional surveillance has not disappeared. Police continue to roam near cafes Eritrea Vietnamese dissidents are followed and sometimes attacked by plainclothes police, cyber-dissident Hu Jia and his wife Zeng Jinyang have endured police permanently stationed at the bottom of their building for months. Bets on wiretapping journalists prying greatly facilitated the work of the intelligence services. But today, the possibilities offered by online monitoring widen the scope of possibilities for governments.
The 2013 edition of the report on the Internet Enemies discusses monitoring within the meaning of the monitoring activity designed to control dissent and the dissemination of sensitive information, an activity exploited to strengthen the powers in place and prevent potential destabilization.
On March 12, World Day against cyber censorship, an initial list of five “United Internet enemies” is made public. It lists the states involved in active surveillance, intrusive, actors information for serious violations of freedom of information and human rights. It is Syria, China, Iran, Bahrain and Vietnam.
A list of five “Companies enemy of the Internet” , otherwise known as “mercenaries of the digital age,” is also published. Gamma Trovicor, Hacking Team, and Blue Coat Amesys were selected for this survey is not exhaustive, known to lie in the coming months. Their products have been or are being used by the authorities for violations of human rights and freedom of information. At the moment when these companies began to trade with authoritarian regimes, they could not ignore the fact that their products could be used to monitor journalists, dissidents and netizens. When these digital surveillance products have been sold to an authoritarian regime through an intermediary, without the publisher not being informed, the inability of the latter to draw sales and exports its own software is indicative of the absence taken into account by these companies to the risk of misuse of their technologies and the vulnerability of human rights.
Surveys conducted by Bloomberg , the Wall Street Journal , and researchers Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto showed that surveillance technology used against dissidents and activists of human rights in countries such as Egypt, Bahrain and Libya from companies Western . Two types of products provided by companies are pinned in this report: the listening material on a large scale to monitor the network as a whole, spyware (spyware) and other devices to implement a targeted surveillance.
These spyware programs are used to spy on the contents of other disks, recover passwords, access the contents of electronic messages or eavesdrop on VOIP communication. They can be installed directly on computers or via the Internet through false up-to-day or attachments in e-mail without the user noticing. The civilian use of such programs is limited. Some manufacturers directly state actors such as intelligence and security services, while others do not hesitate to advertise their capacity to monitor and track political opponents. In authoritarian regimes, this system is used to spy on journalists and their sources to eradicate freedom of information.
Duplication can be done in some technologies used for legitimate fight against cybercrime, they become formidable tools for censorship and surveillance against human rights actors and information when they are used by authoritarian regimes. Lack of supervision of trade in these weapons digital ‘allows authoritarian governments to identify (people-) journalists to take them.
Reporters Without Borders calls for the establishment of export control technologies and monitoring equipment to countries that violate human rights. Such an approach can not be left to the private sector. The legislature must intervene. The European Union and the United States banned the export of surveillance technology to Iran and Syria. A commendable decision which can not remain an isolated act. European governments must adopt a harmonized approach to control the export of surveillance technology . The Obama administration has also adopt this type of legislation, such as the Global Online Freedom Act (GOFA).
Negotiations between governments had yet taken place, resulting in the arrangement of Wassennaar concluded in July 1996, which aims to promote “transparency and greater responsibility in transfers of arms and dual-use goods to prevent destabilizing accumulations. ” It now includes 40 countries including France, Germany, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Democracies seem to gradually give the lure of the required monitoring and cyber security at any price. Evidenced by the proliferation of projects and proposals potentially draconian laws, allowing the establishment of a general surveillance. FISAA CISPA and the United States, British Communications Data Bill UK, wetgeving STD control cybercrime in the Netherlands, many texts that sacrifice freedom of expression on the Internet on the altar of the fight against cybercrime (for more information, read the chapter “Overview of cybercensorship”). The adoption by regimes traditionally respectful of human rights of such draconian laws give arguments to the leaders of countries that adopt repressive legislative arsenal against critical voices.
This is the model of the Internet as conceived by its founders, exchange space and freedom, transcending borders, which is challenged by the acceleration of cyber-censorship and the trivialization of cyber-surveillance. Especially the Internet is the cost of power struggles between states. Widespread surveillance is one of the major players who are struggling to control the governance of the Net. At the World Conference on Telecommunications in Dubai in December 2012, China supported a proposal to drastically extend the control of ITU Internet . China had the support of Russia, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Sudan among others questioning the role of ICANN in the allocation of domain names and IP address ranges the protection of “physical security and operational networks,” the ‘ use of PGD in next generation networks [2] .
The equation is complicated for players information, caught between on the one hand the need for personal protection and security of their online sources, and secondly the need to collect and circulate information . The protection of sources is no longer only the ethics of journalists, it depends more on their mastery of their computer as noted cybersecurity expert Chris Soghoian in a editorial in the New York Times .
Before leaving the field, he is concerned about his physical security, war reporter armed himself with a helmet and a bulletproof vest. Similarly, any journalist should carry a ” survival kit digital “when it is stored or exchange sensitive information online, on your computer or on your mobile phone. This kit, developed gradually by Reporters Without Borders site WeFightCensorship , highlights the need to clean its metadata documents often too talkative , explains how to use the Tor network or virtual private network (VPN) to anonymize communication, provides Tips for secure communications and data on mobile devices etc. ..
Journalists and netizens need to better estimate the potential monitoring and the type of data or communications to protect to find the solution to their situation and, if possible easy to use. Faced with the sophistication of the means deployed by censors and intelligence, the ingenuity of players information and hacktivists who support each is put to the test. But after their tussle depends the future of freedom of information. A fight without bombs, without bars of prisons, bleached without inserts in newspapers, but a fight where if you do not take care, the enemies of truth and reality could impose absolute domination.
Photo by RobH (Own work) [ CC-BY-SA-3.0 ], via Wikimedia Commons
[1] Read the article ” Hackers in Damascus ”
[2] ITU summit in December 2012 in Dubai aimed to standardize norms and standards used on the Internet. One of the standards proposed for the conference was the widespread installation of Deep Packet Inspection technology . This type of technology is extremely intrusive because it provides access to the contents of emails exchanged intercept instant messages and access to the entire content accessed by a user on the Internet.
Why did the bodies of 110 men suddenly wash up in the river running through Aleppo city six weeks ago? A Guardian investigation found out
- Share 36
-
-
-
Martin Chulov with photographs and video by Ben Solomon
- The Guardian, Monday 11 March 2013
-

Bodies revealed by the Queiq river’s receding waters. Photo: Thomas Rassloff/EPA
It is already one of the defining images of the Syrian civil war: a line of bodies at neatly spaced intervals lying on a river bed in the heart of Syria’s second city Aleppo. All 110 victims have been shot in the head, their hands bound with plastic ties behind their back. Their brutal execution only became apparent when the winter high waters of the Queiq river, which courses through the no man’s land between the opposition-held east of the city and the regime-held west, subsided in January.
It’s a picture that begs so many questions: who were these men? How did they die. Why? What does their story tell us about the wretched disintegration of Syria? A Guardian investigation has established a grisly narrative behind the worst – and most visible – massacre to have taken place here. All the men were from neighbourhoods in the eastern rebel-held part of Aleppo. Most were men of working age. Many disappeared at regime checkpoints. They may not be the last to be found. Locals have since dropped a grate from a bridge, directly over an eddy in the river. Corpses were still arriving 10 days after the original discovery on January 29, washed downstream by currents flushed by winter rains.
The grate over the Queiq river in southern Aleppo, which locals have placed hoping to catch the bodies that flow downstream see clip in full article
Just after dawn on 29 January, a car pulled up outside a school being used as a rebel base in the Aleppo suburb of Bustan al-Qasr with news of the massacre. Since then a painstaking task to identify the victims and establish how they died has been inching forwards. The victims, many without names, were mostly buried within three days — 48 hours longer than social custom dictates, to allow for their families to claim them.
Ever since, relatives have been arriving to identify the dead from photographs taken by the rescuers. Each family member who has made the journey to a makeshift office, set up inside a childcare centre, brings with them accounts of when they last saw their father, son, cousin, or brother and where he had travelled before he was murdered.
There are no women on the grisly slideshow of dead men that is replayed in melancholy slow motion every time a relative arrives. Nor are there more than a handful of males aged over 30. Most of the dead dragged from Aleppo’s Queiq River were men of working age.
Another thread strongly unites the fate of the river massacre victims; each of them had either been in the west of the city, or had been trying to get there. They had to pass though checkpoints run by the Syrian army, or their proxy militia, the Shabiha. The process involved handing over identification papers that detailed in which area of the city the holder of the papers lived.
Rime Allaf
January 12, 2012
On January 10, while President Bashar Assad addressed his supporters in Damascus, Syrian authorities handed the tiny tortured body of a four-month old baby girl to her uncle in Homs. Arrested with her parents a few days earlier, one can only assume, knowing the Syrian regime’s documented brutality, that baby Afaf had been thrown into a cell with her mother and submitted to horrific treatment, terrorizing her and her mother and leading to her untimely death.
In its violent repression of the uprising, the Syrian regime has made no distinction between men and women or between adults and children. There has been equality in oppressing, and equality in suffering. But there has also been equality in protesting, albeit in varying degrees of visibility and in different forms.
For the last ten months of the Syrian revolution, many skeptics have repeated the tired refrain that women have been absent from the uprising and that it seems to be a male- dominated (read “Islamist-leaning”) protest movement. Such generalizations, meant to discredit the revolution, do much injustice to the women who have lived the uprising from the start at the side of their compatriots.
It is true that the initial Friday-centric demonstrations were, by default, overwhelmingly comprised of men. With no other possibility to gather freely, protesters met at the mosque and grouped at the end of Friday prayers to start marching and chanting, and week after week the presence of women in these demos was negligible. Moreover, there is little doubt that the sheer brutality of the regime, with its blind random shootings, would have led many men to insist that their female relatives remain at home in an attempt to keep them out of harm’s way.
In this, the Syrian revolution may have differed from others where women were visible from the start, especially as most other revolutions have begun in big cities. But no other revolution has been suppressed with the ferocity of the Syrian regime, nor has any other country (save for Libya after the military intervention started) endured so many casualties. Declaring the Syrian uprising to be woman-less, therefore, would reflect a rather skewed view on the situation and a superficial understanding of how the Syrian regime acts.
As repression got more brutal, the demonstrations spread throughout the country and extended beyond Friday prayers. This resulted in a noticeable increase of women on the streets of Syria, chanting alongside the men and running under fire alongside men. Some organized women-only demonstrations, others mingled in the mixed crowds and some took microphones to lead gatherings’ defiant chants, such as the woman who electrified Homs when she shouted to a roaring crowd that her children would not attend a school that had been used as a torture center.
Even when they weren’t taking to the streets, women’s participation in the revolution has been constant. They have made signs, helped give first aid to the wounded, and run charity networks to distribute aid to the neediest families under siege from the army. While these activities were not undertaken exclusively by women, they played an important role in the logistics behind the protests.
At the same time, civil activism began to develop into new forms, unveiling Syrian creativity and a pressing urge to raise the voice of the revolution. Initiatives included numerous film clips of women in nondescript interiors, their faces hidden with masks and scarves to protect their identity, holding signs that often centered around a single message that the viewer discovered as the camera went around the room. Such events made the rounds of the social networks in the most YouTubed revolution of the “Arab spring”, letting the internet amplify the power of these peaceful protests.
Syrian women have also been essential components of the now famous flash mobs that have so angered the regime with their speed and their efficient messages. Often, women will join the group and start chanting while wearing a headscarf, then separate at the first sign of the infamous “shabbiha” and yank their hijabs off their heads as they melt into the crowd.
Examples of such varied participation are plentiful enough and put to rest the shaky theories about women in Syria’s revolution. In fact, when considering the number of prominent female activists, Syria seems to be a leader rather than a follower, rightfully boasting of the women active in civil society and in revolution. Activists such as Suheir Atassi and Razan Zeitouneh, veterans on the socio-political underground scene at the grassroots level, and writers such as Samar Yazbek, have been part and parcel of the civil society movement challenging the regime openly from inside Syria. Since the revolution began, more women have become focal points for the protest movement, including actresses May Skaf, who was one of the first artists to participate in protests and to be arrested, and Fadwa Suleiman, who has been chanting defiantly from the heart of embattled and besieged Homs.
Moreover, the women who have been politically vocal and active in opposition, including in the main organized groups, seem to easily outnumber, especially proportionally, those in other revolutionary countries. There have been numerous Syrian women discussing Syrian affairs on pan-Arab media, and most are well-known among their compatriots.
While they never imagined that their children would be such easy prey for the regime nor intended them to be part of the movement, Syrian women have from the start been an integral element in the revolution. There is no doubt that they will also be an integral component of post-revolution Syria.
Published 12/1/2012 © bitterlemons-international.org
http://www.bitterlemons-international.org/inside.php?id=1483

- Role of women in Syrian uprising is little reported, but many have played a key part
- Syria no stranger to seeing women in high power roles: Lawyers, bankers, politicians
- As the unrest reaches its second anniversary, women are working as activists and medics
Editor’s note: Editor’s note: This feature, by CNN’s senior international correspondent Arwa Damon first appeared in Turkish Policy Quarterly.
(CNN) — The conversations with Catherine al-Talli over Skype were cryptic, no voice, only text, and they were deleted once the conversation ended. An anti-regime activist, there was no way I could have used her name in my report without putting her in danger.
In the summer of 2011, and I was in Damascus with a CNN team on the first official visas the Syrian government had granted our network since the uprising began around four months earlier.
We knew we were being watched: The intelligence agents in their drab suits trying to hide their faces behind newspapers outside our hotel were impossible to miss. Opposition activists warned us all phones were tapped, and suspected our hotel rooms were as well.
Catherine is no stranger to the ways of the Assad regime. Her father, a longtime activist, was detained in 1992 for eight years. Simply coming out to meet us was a formidable risk for her to take, considering the regime surveillance.
We’d previously arranged hand signals and a meeting point on a crowded street. I was with a female colleague, CNN producer Jomana Karadsheh. We pretended we were shopping, with a small flipcam buried deep in a handbag.
We tailed Catherine through the narrow alleyways of Old Damascus, nervously looking over our shoulders before finally following her into a dark apartment building, where one of her friends lived, and where we could talk.
Catherine, a human rights activist and lawyer, took part in some of the first demonstrations against the regime in Damascus in March. A couple of months later she was detained and imprisoned for 48 hours.
“I saw how they treat prisoners there, they don’t treat them like human beings,” she told us. “I saw how they forced a prisoner to drink toilet water, and I saw how they called a woman activist dirty words.”
She believes she was released because of her prominence as a lawyer, but it forced her to effectively live in hiding.
Like other Syrian women I met during the course of my reporting, Catherine was taking charge and playing a significant role in the revolution.
Protesters shot, beaten
Her focus at the time was to document Syrian government violations, to build a future case to prosecute regime officials and compile evidence of government brutality. She attended dozens of demonstrations, cataloging shootings, beatings, and detentions.
She recalls one protest where activists were chanting for the unity of the Syrian people, the unity of Muslims and Christians.
“Suddenly, the security forces guards jumped in front of the protestors, less than 10m away, and the security forces start shooting the protestors.” She remembered. “We were in the frontlines and at least five next to me were shot and killed at that time, I saw that by my own eyes.
“You asked me about why I am going out when it’s really risky: Because it’s our country, in simple words,” she explained. “It’s our responsibility to make it better.”
A few days later we snuck out once again to attend a secret meeting of opposition activists held at a school in an upscale Damascus neighborhood. Again, they asked us not to use their real names.
Like many of the activists I have met, they have now disappeared, perhaps detained or perhaps, like so many of the more moderate voices of the revolution, driven underground.
One of the women, a Christian, going by the pseudonym Maria, said she used to demonstrate until she nearly died after security forces fired tear gas followed by bullets at a protest she attended.
Catherine al-Talli, Syrian activist
Another young woman, a lawyer and a Muslim, who asked to be called Sana’a, was briefly detained and began working behind the scenes to get other activists out of jail.
For many watching events in Syria unfold, mostly through YouTube videos, it would seem that women are not a factor. But delve behind those first appearances and you will discover that’s not the case.
They may not be as visible as their male counterparts, but women are playing a crucial role, one that is arguably going to grow even more critical. And the nation’s women are from all different backgrounds and beliefs.
Underground clinics
Back in Damascus, some six months after my first meeting with Catherine, I met three women, clad in black from head to toe, in the neighborhood of Kafarsouseh. They said that fear of sexual assault by security forces kept them off the streets.
“We want our voices to be heard, women also want freedom, this is our Syria as well,” they said, echoing one another.
They were from conservative Sunni backgrounds, but they insisted they did not want to live under Islamic law.
All university students, they had dropped out of school and now spent hours stitching together opposition flags, making face masks for the men to wear, and running secret underground clinics to treat the wounded, having gone through a crash course in first aid.
ide Syria’s detention centers
“It was a shock at first,” Insisar, at 19 the youngest of the three, said of seeing gaping wounds. “But we have a goal that we need to reach, so we have to deal with it.”
They also tracked down the families of the dead or detained to provide them with food, blankets and whatever financial aid they could.
Since our meeting, a year has passed, and the phenomenon of the “radicalization of the revolution” has ingrained itself. Extremist groups, like the Nusra Front which the U.S. recently designated a terrorist organization, are at the forefront of the rebel fighting force and seeing their capabilities, influence and ranks grow by the day.
In Aleppo in December a Salafist commander joked that the only thing between him and the Nusra Front was a cigarette. The Front does not allow its fighters to smoke, and he did not want to give up nicotine. That line is a widespread joke I heard more than once during my two weeks there.
We ended up walking with him into a former sweetshop recently turned into a field clinic.
He overheard a conversation I was having with one of the medics, a 19-year-old high school senior who asked us to name her Aya.
Fear and bravery
“You did what?” he asked her, his voice dripping with contempt.
Aya, glared straight at him, her dark eyes lined with bright blue eye shadow, her young face framed by a pale pink headscarf.
“I left my husband and came to volunteer here,” she responded, her voice quiet but defiant.
He gave her a look of utter disgust before he turned on his heel and stormed out of the room.
Relief spilled across Aya’s face, and the faces of her colleagues, but quickly gave way to anger: She was not about to let the Syria she was fighting for be ruled by the likes of him.
Aya’s English is nearly impeccable. She once dreamt of being a lawyer. A new bride, her husband had recently joined the free Syrian army and she left home — with his and her family’s blessing — to train as a medic.
Aya, volunteer medic
“With everything happening in this country, I decided that I am supposed to do something and I just can’t take a gun and fight because I am a girl,” she explained. “So I decided to come here and help in another thing, like… saving people.”
The first time she saw blood, she said she almost fainted.
“Of course I was scared, I scared too much, but there was something inside me telling me that there is something that I am supposed to keep doing,” she says softly.
“I can’t just be afraid and go, I am supposed to stay, and time after time I learn and I have more courage to do this.”
Freedom and democracy
Now, dealing with the influx of wounded has become almost mechanical, part of a macabre daily routine. Despite the horror of what she is witnessing, dwelling on her own emotions is a luxury she cannot afford.
Aya is from a conservative Sunni family, and when it comes to the future of Syria she is fighting for, she says she wants to see something of a blend of both an Islamic and a democratic Syria.
“But democracy is better,” she adds. “We need freedom, we need democracy, we need to say what we want without anyone saying to us, ‘Why are you saying this?'”
Also in Aleppo, I met a young woman who goes by the pseudonym Sama. She walked into the room at a hospital run by the opposition, sporting jeans and long mud-covered boots, her brown hair tied in a loose ponytail, carrying a computer and with a camera slung around her neck.
Having grown accustomed to hearing male voices narrating the various YouTube videos, and having only come across male “media activists,” we were surprised, to say the least.
Sama, in her early 20s, was living with the hospital “staff” — now made up mostly of young men and a handful of women, many of whom had no prior medical experience.
Rajaa al-Talli, Syrian activist
At the onset of the uprising she had been among the many who organized demonstrations at Aleppo University. With aspirations to go into journalism, she picked up a camera and began filming the dead and wounded. It’s something she says one can never get used to.
The day before we met an artillery round had slammed into a crowd of people waiting for bread.
“Despite all the chaos and the pressure around four to five times I just wanted to put the camera down and sit and cry,” she told us.
“But you think to yourself there is a message you have to get out, it is hard and harsh, but it has to get out, it’s your responsibility. You get depressed but then you force yourself to be strong again.”
Trading ideas, ideologies
Among her colleagues at the hospital are people of different backgrounds — moderate, conservative, Islamist, Salafi — and they debate what the future Syria should look like on a regular basis.
In some ways, the revolution has brought together individuals who would never have interacted, traded ideas and ideologies.
“We even shout at each other,” Sama tells us with a wry smile. “I was with the revolution from the start, the revolution is one line, it’s not Islamist, it’s for all Syrians, and Syrians are from all sects.
“At the end, the revolution’s original ideals are going to endure because we are here, those that started it will be there at the end,” she adds. “If something happens and this changes it means it’s our fault because we gave up.”
There is a growing sense of awareness among female activists about the need to ensure the empowerment of women, now more than perhaps ever before.
The fact that Syrian women were among the first to demonstrate against the regime is little reported.
The country is no stranger to seeing women in high power roles, as lawyers, bankers, and politicians.
But despite that, women remain grossly under-represented when it comes to the local opposition councils inside Syria and the opposition bodies that exist outside of the country.
Rajaa al-Talli, Catherine’s younger sister, was in the U.S. on a Fulbright scholarship, studying for a Masters in mathematics in Boston, when the uprising began. Since then she has co-founded the Center for Civil Society and Democracy in Syria.
Rajaa, now based in southern Turkey, has been researching the part played by her fellow countrywomen in the Syrian revolution, and running workshops focused on boosting their role.
Through her work and research with some of the underprivileged women at refugee camps, she found their main concerns for Syria’s future were education and the economy. Politically speaking, they wanted freedom, justice and dignity, though some believed that women should not have leading roles in legislation or governance.
Two-pronged battle
“Some are very inspirational and some are willing to learn,” she explains, speaking over Skype. “In Syria we are not exposed to politics and some women would really like to be involved, they just don’t know how, and we don’t have the advocacy or lobbying skills.
“The men, especially the men now involved in politics, they have more opportunities to educate themselves and gain experience.”
Rajaa is focusing her efforts on empowering women from different levels of society, giving them the skillsets to make their voices and their demands heard.
“My approach is that women are still not doing enough to advocate for themselves, and we are not lobbying each other,” she says. “If women don’t work for it, men won’t care about it.”
Just back from a recent Syrian women’s conference in Doha that brought together between 15 and 20 female activists, she said that among the many discussions was the role that women needed to play in a post-Assad era, from transitional justice, to rule of law, to governance, and getting women more involved in the decision making process.
The groups set an ambitious target: 50% representation for women in government, and to try to alter the dynamics of local councils and opposition bodies by demanding and working for more female representation.
“The pillars of extremism and radicalism are usually [used] to oppress women,” Rajaa says. “Having more women empowered is hitting one of the pillars that support extremism.”
She and others fully realize that the next set of rules may want to sideline them, to relegate them to the shadows.
For the women of the Syrian opposition, this is a two-pronged battle: Fighting for freedom against an oppressive regime, and battling just as hard to ensure that their individual rights do not perish in the process as the landscape and dynamics of the Syrian uprising shift.
It is by no means an easy goal, nor is its success ensured, but the majority of Syrian women I have met over the last two years through my reporting are not going to sit silently by and watch while their freedoms are stolen from them or their future dictated to them.
A must see , due to Mr Kilo’s frank, no holds barred statements in it. Note his repeated insistence on rejecting the qualification ‘speaking as a Christian?’: “I am not a Christian, the very last thing that i care about is being a Christian, I am a Syrian national (nationalistic Syrian?) I speak as a democratic nationalistic Syrian one of whose descriptions is that he was born to a Christian family,…and who cares about the interests of his people, every single individual of his people regardless of which grouping the individual belongs to…”
He has strong words about and for the MB, along with advice.
“Today there is no danger to Christians from Muslims, Muslims are their brothers, and like them, are part of the Syrian people, demanding their freedom… and I believe that Christians must join in this demand for freedom because it is not reasonable, tomorrow when the regime is gone, when we have everywhere thousands of youths who were martyred for the sake of freedom, it is unreasonable that those who did not join in and contribute to this struggle and fight for this freedom to enjoy these full freedoms without having given any sacrifices (for these freedoms). From a moral and patriotic point of view it is an unacceptable position. He who witnesses the battle for freedom without taking part in it, who will go on to gain his freedom like all others, is committing an immoral act towards his country and towards his other fellow countrymen. He must join them (now) to deserve this freedom and for this freedom must be of the making of his own hands not the result of the sacrifices of others whose positions he never tried to understand.”
Mr Kilo’s comment applies to all Syrians who are standing on the sidleines, whether Christian, Sunni, Alawi, Druz or Kurd, or whatever…(cousins, are you listening???)

