Search

band annie's Weblog

I have a parallel blog in French at http://anniebannie.net

Category

Palestine

Stand by me! by Sana Kassem

This video tends to disappear, so hurry !

Mother still restricted from visiting son after his release from prison

Jillian Kestler-D’Amours

18 October 2011

Rawda Odeh carries a photograph of her son, who is being released from prison — not back home to his family in Jerusalem, but to Gaza, “a big jail,” she said.

SHEIKH JARRAH, East Jerusalem (IPS) – Rawda Odeh had mixed feelings when she heard the news that her son, 33-year-old Loai Mohammad Ahmed Odeh, was going to be released from prison as a result of the recently brokered prisoner exchange agreement between Israel and Hamas.

“I was hoping that I would hug my son when he will be released and I was waiting for this ten years. But when I heard that he would be released to Gaza, I was disappointed. I found out that he would be deported to Gaza forever. He will not return back home,” Odeh, whose son was arrested in 2002 and sentenced to 28 years in prison, said.

Sitting in the East Jerusalem compound of the International Committee of the Red Cross, where she and two others were on hunger strike in solidarity with Palestinian prisoners who remain in Israeli jails, Odeh explained that she doesn’t know if she will be able to travel to Gaza or elsewhere to see her son.

“Up until now, I don’t know when I will see my son. Maybe the United States is closer [for us to meet] than Gaza,” Odeh said. “It was mixed, my feelings, because freedom is the most beautiful thing in the world. I think that my son got his freedom, even if Gaza is a big jail. I was disappointed a little bit but I’m happy that he gets his freedom.”

Mediated by Egyptian security authorities, Hamas and Israel reached a deal on 11 October for the release of 1,027 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

The Palestinian prisoners will be released in two waves: a first group of 477 were released beginning on Tuesday, and another 550 will be freed in about two months time.

According to a list provided by Israel Prison Service on 15 October, of the 477 Palestinian prisoners to be released first, 41 prisoners will be deported to countries abroad, 146 — including Odeh’s son — will be sent to Gaza permanently, and 18 will be sent to Gaza for three years.

Thousands continue to suffer

“Prisoners are protected persons under the Fourth Geneva Convention and cannot be deported from their homes or their homeland. By emphasizing deportations, Israel is continuing its policy to deport Palestinians,” said Shawan Jabarin, director general of Al-Haq, a Palestinian human rights organization based in Ramallah in the occupied West Bank.

“Because of the deportations, the transfer of the prisoners, many people can’t be unified with their family members because of the Israeli restrictions on movement,” he added.

Jabarin said that while he welcomed the release of Gilad Shalit and the 1,027 Palestinian prisoners, thousands more Palestinians remain in Israeli jails and continue to suffer from difficult and inhumane conditions.

“If more than 1,000 Palestinians were released — which is a good thing for their families, their society and for themselves as human beings — the problems still continue [in the prisons]. You have around 5,000 prisoners who will stay in the prison and suffer without fundamental rights,” he said.

Thousands of prisoners from across all major Palestinian political factions have been participating in an open-ended hunger strike, which began on 27 September in protest against deteriorating prison conditions and a lack of basic rights in Israeli jails.

However, on Tuesday, prisoners announced that they had temporarily suspended their hunger strikes for three days after the Israeli Prison Service agreed to end solitary confinement policies.

Hunger strikers’ demands so far unrealized

In June, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that he was imposing harsher restrictions on Palestinian prisoners, due to the fact that captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was still being held by Hamas in Gaza. It remains to be seen if these conditions will remain in place following Shalit’s release.

Now into their third week without food, the hunger-striking Palestinian prisoners are not only demanding an end to Israel’s use of solitary confinement, including that of Ahmad Saadat, general secretary of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), but also an end to acts of collective punishment, such as restrictions on access to education, family and lawyer visits, and healthcare.

“The Israeli authorities are dealing with them not as prisoners, but as people without rights, and they are using their situation for political reasons. After this exchange, I hope that things will improve in a good way, even if I have doubts because the Israelis have used this policy for so long; it’s not just in relation to Shalit,” Jabarin said.

In a statement released on 9 October, the Israeli Prison Service described the condition of the Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike as “satisfactory” and said that they are under daily medical supervision and have received visits by members of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Palestinian human rights groups, however, have reported that prisoners have been regularly denied lawyer visits and water, and that the Israeli prison authorities have beaten and attacked prisoners in an effort to stop the hunger strike.

“It’s a dangerous moment. There’s a danger to the prisoners’ lives. I think that if the Israelis continue to ignore their demands and their requests, the situation will maybe deteriorate not just in the prisons, but outside the prisons also. If someone dies, then the situation may deteriorate outside and the Israelis should be aware of that,” Jabarin said.

Back in East Jerusalem, Rawda Odeh said that despite the release of her son and the more than 1,000 other Palestinian prisoners, continuing to apply pressure on the Israeli authorities to improve prison conditions and to respect international law is crucial.

“I’m not on hunger strike for only my son; all the prisoners are my sons,” Odeh said.

“All the world knows the name of Shalit but they don’t know any names of our prisoners who are in jail, so I’m on hunger strike. I have two cancers, one in my breast and one in my liver. I have diabetes. I have many health problems but I decided to be with the prisoners. I’m supporting them because it’s my duty to be with them. We are in the same struggle and we’ll be together always.”

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service (2011). Total or partial publication, retransmission or sale forbidden.

source

Al-quds – Jerusalem by Fairouz

Ramallah: Palestinian Political Prisoners Release 18-10-2011

[youtube http://youtu.be/ssxzUq-VFUA?]

“I was 1-day-old when my father was jailed”

Shahd Abusalama

18 October 2011

Emotional scenes as Palestinian prisoners reunited with their loved ones today.

A very confusing feeling passes through me after hearing about the exchange of 1,027 Palestinian detainees for the only Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, who was held captive by the Palestinian resistance fighters. I don’t know whether to feel happy or sad.

Gazing at the faces of the prisoners’ families in the solidarity tent in Gaza City, I see a look that I have never seen before: eyes glittering with hope. These people have attended every event in solidarity with our detainees, have never given up hope that their freedom is inevitable someday, and have stayed strong during their loved ones’ absence inside Israeli cells. Thinking about those women whose relatives are most likely to be released and seeing their big smiles makes me happy. But at the same time, thinking about the other 5,000 detainees who will steadfastly go on with their resistance in the prisons makes my heart break for them.

Hearts aching for those still in jail

When I arrived at the tent on 12 October, the wife of the prisoner Nafez Herz, who was sentenced to life-long imprisonment and has been jailed for 26 years, shook hands with me and said very excitedly that she had heard that her husband would be freed. Then she said, “But you can’t imagine how much my heart aches for those families whose prisoner will not be released in this exchange deal. All prisoners’ families have become like one big family. We meet weekly, if not daily in the Red Cross, we share our torments, and we understand each other’s suffering.” I grabbed her hands and pressed them while saying, “We will never forget them, and God willing, they will gain their freedom soon.”

While I was writing this article among the crowd of people at the Red Cross building, I suddenly heard people chanting and clapping and could see a woman jumping with joy. While on the phone, she said loudly, “My husband is going to be free!” Her husband is Abu Thaer Ghneem, who received a life sentence and spent 22 years in prison. As I watched people celebrating and singing for the freedom of the Palestinian detainees, I met his only son, Thaer. He was hugging his mother tight while giving prayers to God showing their thankfulness. I touched his shoulder, attempting to get his attention. “Congratulations! How do you feel?” I asked him. “I was only one day old when my father was arrested, and now I am 22-years-old. I’ve always known that I had a father in prison, but never had him around. Now my father is finally going to be set free and fill his place, which has been empty over the course of 22 years of my life.”

His answer was very touching and left me shocked and admiring. While he was talking to me, I sensed how he couldn’t find words to describe his happiness at his father’s freedom.

The celebration continues for an hour. Then I return to my former confusion, feeling drowned in a stream of thoughts. The families of the 1,027 detainees will celebrate the freedom of their relatives, but what about the fate of the rest of the prisoners?

Don’t forget the hunger strike

I have heard lots of information since last night concerning the names of the soon-to-be-released prisoners, but it was hard to find two sources sharing the same news, especially about Ahmad Saadat and Marwan Barghouti and whether they are involved in the exchange deal. I’ve always felt spiritually connected to them, especially Saadat, as he is my father’s friend. I can’t handle thinking that he may not be involved in this exchange deal. He has had enough merciless torment inside Israeli solitary confinement for over two and a half years.

Let’s not forget those who are still inside the Israeli occupation’s prisons and who have been on hunger strike, as this hunger strike wasn’t held for an exchange deal, but for the Israeli Prison Service to meet the prisoners’ demands. The people who joined the hunger strike in Gaza City has included those with loved ones in prison. We have to speak out loudly and tell the world that Israel must address our living martyrs’ demands. We will never stop singing for the freedom of Palestinian detainees until the Israeli prisons are emptied.

Shahd Abusalama is an artist, blogger and English literature student from the Gaza Strip. Her blog is called Palestine from My Eyes.

Hip-hop band DAM supports Palestinian prisoners’ actions with new track

[youtube http://youtu.be/R6Kq-NeHqlE?]

SEE ARTICLE HERE

The Most Important Prisoner in the Whole Wide World Submitted by Jaime Omar Yassin on Thu, 10/

Hatem Omar

13/2011 – 20:16

Its possible that there is a name more well-known than Gilad Shalit this week, but not likely. For the last two days, media of all kinds have been tripping over themselves trying to describe, explain, hagiographize, and contextualize Shalit, who is to be released soon after a five year detention by Hamas in a prisoner swap.

But the silence on the one thousand Palestinian lives to be exchanged for Shalit is deafening. Many Palestinians and supporters have been fuming at the discrepancy, but its not entirely true that all of the names and faces of the likely thousand to be released have been ignored. Rather, US media drama queens have enthusiastically joined in the shirt-rending of Israeli punditry and officials about the “terrorists” and “murderers” that are likely to be released under the deal, enumerating Hamas’ alleged top ten list of prisoners implicated in some act of violence against Israelis during the Israeli Palestinian conflict.

Media Mirror Israeli Focus on Schalit

Mainstream media have been happy to have Israeli officials direct the narrative for them. The Associated Press [Wednesday, October 12] introduced an article by reiterating the anxiety Israelis now claim to suffer under with the release of the Palestinian prisoners. Jennifer Rubin’s column in the Washington Post was particularly nauseating. Though Rubin, like others, has no concrete list of the prisoners that will be released, she offers one anyway, richly embroidered with misleading statements. The Washington Post also carried a primer on Schalit, as well as a photo story which even seemed to imply that even Gazans care more about Schalit’s release than that the freedom of other Palestinians.

New York Times Jerusalem Desk Editor, Ethan Bronner excelled at the one sided coverage he is now famous for, reiterating Israeli talking points and reinforcing the idea that Palestinian prisoners in general present a threat of violence for Israelis:

Israel worries about having to contend with dozens of convicted militants’ suddenly being freed, some of them to the West Bank […] Israel agreed to allow more prisoners back into the West Bank even though the history of such releases suggests that some released killers return to violence

This is highly ironical in that there are no guarantees that Israel will not simply arbitararily arrest more Palestinians soon after the swap, as it has done in the past. But, of course, those are Palestinian concerns, and apparently not worth reporting. Though Bronner reports on a local strike in support of Palestinian prisoners, he fails to mention the hunger strike currently being waged by Palestinian prisoners , nor a solidarity strike by Haifa youth within the 1948 borders.  Bronner visited Gaza and the West Bank, but did not bother seeking out families with loved ones in Israeli prisons. As Ali Abunimah notes, Bronner also misleads readers about Israel’s cross-border attack on Egyptian soldiers.

Disinterest in the Personal Stories of Palestinian Prisoners

Fond of Schalit’s case, media organizations like the NYT, the Washington Post and CNN have an odd antipathy to the plight of over 5,000 Palestinian political prisoners. Certainly, there’s been a disinterest in the fact that at least 200 of the Palestinian prisoners will be exiled to Gaza and other countries. Such reporting ensures that many Americans by now know well the name of combat soldier Shalit. Some may even know the names of the most notorious [by American standards] of Israel’s prisoners. It remains unlikely that they will ever know any others.  They’ll hear little or nothing of the over 5,000 political prisoners currently in Israeli jails.

Certainly, not the names of over two hundred Palestinians under administrative detention, charged with no crimes at all, some incarcerated for over two or as many as five years. Not the names of Naji and Bassem Tamimi, who were arrested by Israel’s occupation forces for civil disobedience against a totalitarian military regime—acts which are celebrated throughout the region with the one exception being the Arab world’s “only democracy”.

Not the name of Hana Al Shalabi, a twenty-eight year old Jenin resident, never charged with a crime, but held in concurrent administrative detention for over two years. Not the name of Ayed Dudeen, an ambulance driver and activist, recently arrested again just a few weeks after being released from a four year stint of Israeli administrative detention.

Like Dudeen and many other Palestinians, the Tamimis had been arrested several times over the last two decades, and held for various periods, but never charged. The Tamimis have recently been jailed for the alleged offense of “solicitation” to throw stones at Israeli soldiers—a charge too ridiculous to be distinguished from administrative detention except for its advantage of having an end-dated sentence.

There is little that separates Israeli occupation justice—used like a magic wand by Israel to intimidate Palestinian communities and their leaders for over forty years—from the one imposed on Schalit by Hamas. The biggest difference, of course, is that Palestinians have only one prisoner: an adult who volunteerd for combat service in a military occupation. Somehow, at that time and since, the story that Israel holds thousands of Palestinians—some in a never-ending cycle of renewable detention, some of them even children—has been rejected again and again, in favor of ongoing saga of Schalit and his long suffering family. The dynamic continues today and shows no sign of abating soon.

source

Brutal eviction of Palestinian family in Jaffa caught on tape by Kate on October 6, 2011

[youtube http://youtu.be/QRHqU8H1CVk?]

Jaffa family to sue for excessive force in house eviction
JPost 6 Oct — An Israeli-Arab family from Jaffa said Thursday they plan to file a lawsuit against the police, after officers used what appears to be excessive force to evict them from a south Tel Aviv house they were squatting in on Tuesday. In an amateur video taken at the scene, a group of YASSAM riot police can be seen wrestling with Sameer Kassem, 34, as he holds his four-year-old daughter in his hands: The video shows police kicking and punching Kassem while he lies on the ground, and one officer puts his sister, a Muslim woman wearing a veil, in a headlock and throws her to the ground. No social workers or female police are present at the scene, even though it constituted the eviction of a family with young children … Sameer said he and his family have been homeless since May when his mother, who used to help him with his expenses, died and he could no longer pay rent. He said that he, his wife, and their five children moved to the vacant house on Salameh Street about two weeks ago after someone set their tent at the Shtayim park on fire.

source

Son of Israeli general speaks for Palestine

Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Miko Peled.

Israeli activist and author Miko Peled, currently touring Australia, is convinced that the Israel-Palestine conflict can be solved.

But, he told public meetings in Sydney and Newcastle, he doesn’t believe that it will happen while the government of Israel remains committed to Zionism (the maintenance of Israel as an exclusively “Jewish” state) and continues its ethnic cleansing operation by moving Palestinians off their land.

“It is not some inexorable process of nature,” Peled said. “It is a conflict between people, and it is therefore something over which people can have control.”

Peled was raised in a prominent Zionist family in Jerusalem. His grandfather, Dr Avraham Katsnelson, was a Zionist leader and signatory to the May 14, 1948 Israeli Declaration of Independence.

Katsnelson was also a member of Hashomer Hatzair Workers Party of Palestine that, in 1946, was the sole Zionist political organisation in Palestine at the time that recognised the national rights of the Palestinian Arabs.

Peled’s father, Matti Peled, was a young officer in the war of 1948 that led to Israel’s establishment. He was a general in the war of 1967 when Israel conquered the West Bank, Gaza, Golan Heights and the Sinai from Egypt, Jordan and Syria.

When he retired, Matti Peled became part of a group of retired army officers who met secretly with the Palestine Liberation Organisation to work on finding a two-state solution.

Peled recounted several life changing episodes — including the death of his niece from a suicide bombing attack in 1997 and the deaths of children of several Palestinian friends — that pushed him to discover and understand the true nature of Israel’s ongoing war on Palestinians that was having such a devastating impact on his family and friends.

He is now a fearless campaigner for one secular state for Palestinians and Israelis in which all live in equality.

He also supports the non-violent boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. He said the boycott of Max Brenner cafes was not anti-Semitic, explaining how the Stauss Group openly support the Israeli government’s apartheid politics and an Israeli army unit responsible for war crimes.

He added: “All businesses based in Israeli are a legitimate target, since all of Israel is based on Palestinian land.”

Peled was asked to brief the ALP’s foreign affairs committee in Canberra. He said he was asked some strange questions in response to his argument for one democratic secular state. Someone asked, “But wouldn’t the Arabs outnumber Jews if there was a single state?” Peled answered, “Yes. And?”

Responding to foreign minister Kevin Rudd’s accusations that BDS was “anti-Semitic”, Peled said there is no comparison. “Then, the Jews were victims. Today, it is the Israeli Defence Force [IDF] that is a terrorist organisation. Mr Rudd should be proud that Australians are standing up for the cause of justice and supporting the BDS.”

It takes enormous courage to stand up against the Zionist mind-set Israelis are raised with. Peled recounted a moving story about his first journey to the West Bank. It was a pivotal moment.

Driving past the Israeli checkpoints into the West Bank, in an Israeli-plated car, he suddenly felt very unsafe. His unfounded fears worsened when became lost and felt he couldn’t ask for directions as he only spoke Hebrew.

He finally managed to arrive at his destination in Bil’in — unscathed.

Peled now laughs while narrating this story. But he expresses concern that Israelis are taught from a young age to be racist by the racism embedded in their text books. For example, school maps of Israel do not include any Palestinian towns.

Children grow into adults only knowing that Israel is surrounded by it Arab neighbours and have little or no idea of the reality of the Occupied Territories.

Peled references tragic personal events alongside Israel’s 2008-09 attack on Gaza as examples of terrorism. He describes the 2008-2009 Israeli attack on Gaza — Operation Cast Lead — a deliberate act of terrorism committed against children.

“Gaza is a children’s land: there are 800,000 children there. The aerial bombing was timed to start precisely when the first shift of Palestinian school children were leaving school to go home. The second shift were leaving home to go to school.

“The Israel pilots who carried out the bombing went home every night to their wives and families, and go up the next morning to do it again and again.”

His conclusion is that Israel is a terrorist state, that Israel’s conquest of Palestine has been made “irreversible” and that a Palestinian state based on the territories Israel occupied in 1967 (the West Bank and Gaza) “can never emerge”.

Referring to the Palestinian Authority’s current push for a Palestinian state in the United Nations, he reminded people that the UN had already voted that way — in 1947. When Israel was created, in 1947, an overwhelming majority of countries voted in favour of the Partition Plan: 33 in favor, 13 against with 10 abstentions.

“However Israel immediately set out to conquer some 80% of the remaining Palestinian territory, destroying hundreds of homes and forcing some 800,000 people to flee. Its aim was to make sure the conquest of Palestine was irreversible, to prevent any possibility of a Palestinian state emerging.”

Peled exposed the myth that Israel launched the Six-day war in 1967 because it faced an external threat from neighbouring Arab states. Rather, his father, General Peled, urged the Israel cabinet to attack its neighbours arguing that an opportunistic attack would succeed as the Arab states were “unprepared”.

Peled said that documents from cabinet meetings prior to the war confirm that there was never any mention of any existential threats.

Immediately after the war, his father argued for a Palestinian state to be set up in the West Bank and Gaza Strip “to avoid Israel becoming an occupying power”. This was advice the Israeli Cabinet did not take.

“The two-state solution may have been possible 50 years ago”, Peled argued, “but not now.”

“Both sides have much the same population but Israel takes 80% of the resources. Palestinians are given about 1/20th the amount of water allocated to the Israeli settlers, for instance, and Israel refuses to negotiate this.”

But Peled believes that there is hope. “There is growing discussion that Israel has to change from being an occupier to a democracy”, Peled said. Citing the uprisings across the Arab world, Peled commented that mid way through last year it was inconceivable to imagine Egypt without Mubarak. “Change doesn’t happen from a single cause or reason. Apartheid in South Africa fell because of pressure from the outside, as well as within.

“Zionism is incompatible with peace because it offers no compromise. The only solution is to dismantle the Zionist framework and apply the rule of law equally to both people. It is not impossible, because the people of Egypt remind us that nothing is impossible.”

[Miko Peled’s book, The General’s Son will be available in February 2012. To find out more click here.]

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑