Search

band annie's Weblog

I have a parallel blog in French at http://anniebannie.net

Month

November 2012

Syrians choose war over Jordan Zaatari refugee camp

By Sakhr Al-Makhadhi BBC News, Mafraq, Jordan

A bus prepares to leave the Zaatari Refugee Camp
Families say goodbye to loved ones who are leaving the Zaatari refugee camp to return to Syria

The Zaatari camp in northern Jordan was meant to be a place of refuge for 30,000 Syrians. But every day, dozens are choosing to leave the safety of Jordan and make the perilous journey back into the war zone.

The sun is setting on Zaatari as a mother pleads with a soldier to be allowed on to a bus. Around her, dozens of Syrians say their farewells as the engine starts up. While an estimated 360,000 Syrians have fled their homeland, this busload is making the opposite journey.

“We face a slow death here, or a fast death over there,” says Hussain Ayish, pointing towards the border at the other end of the scrubland. As we talk, a low-flying Jordanian military jet and a fleet of helicopters circle overhead.

Truck after truck, most carrying drinking water, files past the Jordanian army tank and along the muddy road at the heart of the camp. Kids chase each vehicle and scrabble to ride up on the back of it.


Zaatari Refugee Camp

Zaatari is essentially an internment camp – built to house Syrians who have crossed the border illegally”

“Hide your car well,” says Bilal, a police officer. “They have no respect, they will throw stones at you,” he warns. “And make sure you are back before dark.”

This place of refuge has become the setting for an increasingly ugly battle between Syrian refugees and their Jordanian hosts. Demonstrations inside the camp have, on at least one occasion, turned violent, prompting an exodus back into Syria.

Like many of Zaatari’s inhabitants, the Howshan family comes from Deraa, the birthplace of the Syrian revolution, just over the border from here.

I am sitting at the entrance to their tent. The canvas is a dirty yellow, and they have scribbled their name on the outside in marker pen.

They have built a breezeblock barrier around the entrance in a futile attempt to keep the sand out. But it is no use. It gets everywhere – on the grey mattresses that line the edges of the tent, in the blankets, in the water, in the food.

This is my second visit to their temporary home. The mood is a lot more grim than last time.

“Remember my son?” asks Saeed Howshan. “He’s in hospital now, the food, this dirty food,” he says, as his cousin Ali opens one of the brown ration boxes to show me a rotten egg that he claims was this morning’s breakfast.

Saed Howshan and his nephews
Saed Howshan says his nephews (pictured) are treated “worse than animals” at Zaatari

“No matter what we do, the problems continue,” says Saeed as his nephews sit around him. He is getting animated, performing to an audience. “Even camels do not live on this land. They are treating us worse than animals.”

At this point, a Jordanian charity worker hears the commotion and ducks down, peering into the tent.

“I hope you are not saying anything against the Kingdom, are you?” he asks. The conversation turns into an argument, with the Jordanian accusing the Howshans of lying.

The Jordanian government insists the refugees’ basic needs are met, and claims that supporters of the Syrian regime have infiltrated the camp to cause trouble.

One high-placed official tells me pro-regime shabiha, Syrian paramilitary thugs, militiamen have been planted among the refugees to feed information back to the regime in Damascus.

“If we found one,” Ali says, referring to Syrian agents, “we would kick them out”. But he adamantly denies that the violence was a set up. “We have just had enough,” he says.The authorities have laid fresh gravel on the main track through the camp. And as we walk along here, dodging the trucks, Ali and his brother Mohsen show me a burnt out portacabin.

“This happened last week,” Ali tells me. “They closed the main road, sent in 300 police and tear-gassed us.”

Ali says it started out as a peaceful demonstration after two days of what he claims was inedible food and a lack of clean water. The United Nations Children’s Fund (Unicef) insists it checks the water twice a day.

There is open hostility on both sides. Police and soldiers patrol the perimeter to make sure no-one gets in and no-one leaves. “We are living in a prison,” Saeed Howshan tells me. “It is like we are prisoners of the Jordanians, it is as if they are working with the Syrian regime.”

Zaatari is essentially an internment camp – built to house Syrians who have crossed the border illegally.

Many of them fled the war zone with the help of the Free Syrian Army and were picked up by the Jordanian forces who have been co-ordinating with the rebels.

Burnt out portacabin
A portacabin was burnt out during a protest over a lack of clean water and edible food in the camp

When the conflict first broke out, Syrians – who can enter Jordan without a visa – were housed in the cities and cared for by the government. But as the trickle turned into a flood, the Zaatari tent city was erected in the desert and opened in July.

The Jordanian government estimates the country is now home to 200,000 refugees, 15% of them here in the camp.

As night falls over Zaatari, my phone rings, the authorities are telling me that I should have already left the camp. I am at risk, they insist. A small crowd has gathered near the blue toilet block plastered with Unicef logos. They are chanting against Bashar, rather than their Jordanian hosts, tonight.

Ali links arms with me and walks me to the gate where the soldiers are waiting for me. “I am surviving on juice and biscuits,” he says. “Take me out with you.” A soldier orders him back inside.

Like most other refugees I talk to, escape from Zaatari is the only thing on Ali’s mind.

source

Syrians Are War Correspondents, Too

A response to Terry Anderson’s “Running Toward Danger.”

BY AMAL HANANO | OCTOBER 30, 2012

Dear Mr. Anderson,

I read “Running Toward Danger” yesterday and I had to tell you how much it moved me. Syria is being ripped to shreds, the people are suffering, and the cities are being destroyed. We didn’t expect this degree of ruthlessness as a response to the people’s demands for freedom after 40 years of Assad tyranny, but as we know well, freedom is not free.

Your thoughts on war correspondents sacrificing everything for the truth applies not only to the brave journalists like Austin and Marie and Anthony and the dozens of journalists inside Syria now, but also to the Syrian men and women who stood behind the cameras, documenting the truth. We have lost dozens of citizen journalists in this revolution. Young men who were students, employees, fathers one day and became threatening targets the next day because of their cell phones, cameras, and laptops. They knew Syrians have been silent too long. Last year, they decided to never cover up Assad’s crimes with silence again. And they are paying a heavy price for it.

I don’t know what my dead friends would have answered your question, “Was it worth it?” But I do know what the ones who are alive and still film and photograph in Homs, Aleppo, Hama, Idleb, Daraa, and across Syria would say to the question, “Is it worth it to die for your camera?” They would say, “Yes.” Because they know for the first time in their lives, their voice matters and they are doing the most important job, to tell the truth while so many are telling lies. Telling the truth, in a way, has become even more important than freedom. It’s the road to freedom.

I’ve been writing about the revolution since the beginning. I didn’t expect to take on the role I now have when I began; telling my stories evolved into telling Syria’s stories. I only cared about one thing: telling the truth. Sometimes it seems like an impossible task. And many times the truth hurts. But we have to keep going and hope that what’s good in the people prevails over the evil.

When I read your piece, I remembered Anthony Shadid, a journalist who changed my life, and how much I miss his voice of truth. And I thought of Austin too. I pray he is safe and will return to his family soon.

Most of all, I wanted to tell you that your words made a difference to me. God bless you.

With much respect,
Amal

On Facebook, IDF illustrates Palestinian violence – with photo from Bahrain

An infographic purportedly depicting Palestinian attacks in the West Bank makes its case with a photo shot during a Bahrain protest. This would not be the first time the army posted misleading photographs to Facebook to serve its PR machine.

By Mati Milstein

On October 17, the Israeli military posted the above infographic on its Facebook page. The image includes a photograph of a young masked man holding a firebomb and featuring statistics regarding the number of firebomb attacks against Israelis in the West Bank since the start of 2012. The Israeli military urges Facebook users to share the image “because the mainstream media will not.”

In fact, the mainstream media did share this photo extensively – in its coverage of protests in Bahrain.

This powerful image has nothing to do with Judea, Samaria, Palestinians or Israelis. It was shot by Reuters photographer Hamad I Mohammed during protests in the Bahraini village of Salmabad last April.

The Israeli military’s decision to use foreign photos to illustrate attacks in the West Bank as part of its propaganda efforts (without indicating that the image is only an illustration) may raise some interesting questions about its own ethical perception and standards.

This is not the first time the army has faced this particular criticism. In June, the army marked gay pride month by posting a photograph of two male Israeli soldiers holding hands. It was later revealed that the two soldiers are not a couple and only one of them is gay.

The use of a photo unrelated to the incident it purports to be illustrating was also more striking given the recent Israeli reaction to another alleged misuse of photographs.

Last March, Israeli military and political figures demanded the United Nation’s OCHA office in Jerusalem fire a staff member after she tweeted a photograph of a fatally wounded girl, whom she indicated had just been killed by Israeli fire in Gaza.

Pro-Israel activists and government officials maintained that the photograph had been published by Reuters in 2006 and a veritable campaign was launched besmirching the OCHA employee. Beyond the hypocrisy inherent in doing something that you had only just condemned others for doing, we should remember a key distinction between the two incidents: While the OCHA employee published the concerned photograph on her private Twitter account, as a private citizen, the Israel Defense Force is an official body and its Facebook page is an official government channel.

There are two options here: 1) The Israeli military did not know the source of the Bahraini image and did not bother to investigate before choosing to use the image (an “investigation” that took me only five minutes); 2) The military was aware of the photograph’s origin and chose to use it anyway in a misleading manner.

The IDF Spokespersons’ new media section has been contacted for comment. This post will be updated should a response be received.

source

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑