Search

band annie's Weblog

I have a parallel blog in French at http://anniebannie.net

Month

November 2011

Syrian refugees tell of rape, murder and destruction

Watch Kholood and Qotayba tell their stories about the Syria refugee crisis

Newsnight’s Shaimaa Khalil hears testimony in Lebanon from Syrians who have fled their country after protests which have reportedly left 1,100 people dead, hundreds more injured and thousands under arrest.

KHOLOOD – A PROTESTING MOTHER

“You have to cover my face and change my voice otherwise they’ll know it’s me,” Kholood says.

“They have been watching us and they have my name on the wanted list for protesting.”

Kholood (not her real name) is a mother of four who, like thousands of other Syrian refugees, fled the border town of Talkalakh into the Wadi Khaled region in northern Lebanon after the Syrian army and security forces began their crack down on protesters.

Arida, the Lebanese village where Kholood and her family are now staying is only a stone’s throw away from the Syrian border.

You can see Syrian flags fluttering in the breeze and Syrian army personnel patrolling across the border – too close for the refugees’ comfort.

“When we saw what happened in Deraa, Banyas and Talbiseh, and how the people came out like they did we thought, ‘why not us? We should come out too!’ and we did and called for the fall of the regime.”

But the situation turned deadly when the Syrian security forces arrived in Talkalakh last month with tanks and armoured vehicles to crack down on protesters.

“There was non-stop shooting. When I looked out of the window I saw destruction all around. Glass everywhere. They had bulldozed some houses to the ground.”

Kholood continues: “That night we decided to flee. I crossed the bridge with my husband and youngest son.”

“We were all so scared. Some of the people that fled with us were shot on the way. Some were badly wounded and some died before reaching Wadi Khalid.”

Kholood was also fearful of being raped:

“I left Talkalakh to protect my honour. When we talk to our relatives in Banyas, Homs and Talbiseh they tell us horrifying stories. They told us that so many women were raped. These men don’t fear God.”

When I ask her about her three sons, aged 16 to 21 who chose to stay behind in Syria, Kholood bursts into tears.

“I’d be lying if I told you I didn’t want them here with me. I want to tell them to come here, but instead I tell them they should stay and be strong and fight.”

“They are my children. I love them, but we have to sacrifice if we want victory. This is much stronger than a mother’s love,” she cries.

When I ask if she hopes to one day return to Syria, Kholood looks at me defiantly.

“When the regime falls,” she says. “And it will fall, inshallah.”

QOTAYBA – A SOLDIER WHO SWITCHED SIDES

“They gave us orders to fire heavily at unarmed civilians,” Qotayba al Akkari tells me.

“There was random shooting at people, no distinction between women, children, armed or unarmed men. Many, many were killed, many unarmed civilians.”

A Syrian army soldier, he fled to Lebanon and is now sitting among a group of Syrian activists.

“Our commanding officer would say: ‘There’s so much ammunition, no one is going to ask you where it went. Fire!'”

“I would fire in the air or at empty buildings because I knew that if they found out I wasn’t firing they’d detain me or kill me.”

“At first, I felt like I was having a nervous breakdown I was so surprised at all that was happening around me but after a while I got used to it and all the dead bodies.”

“Soldiers have no idea what goes on in Syria. They don’t allow us to watch any news channels except Syrian TV. They would accuse us of treachery if they caught us watching Al-Jazeera, Al-Arabiya or BBC.”

“There was also no contact between soldiers and their families, the mobile phone coverage was so bad. But even when the soldiers did manage to speak to their families, the families wouldn’t dare say that anything was wrong. The soldiers would ask ‘is everything ok?’ and the families would say ‘Yes, all fine.'”

Qotayba says that he now feels free, but that one day he will return to Syria, to fight with other soldiers who have defected.

“I’m not afraid anymore,” he tells me.

IBN TALKALAKH – A SHOP OWNER TURNED ACTIVIST

“Call me, Ibn Talkalakh,” the young textile shop owner tells me.

The name means ‘The son of Talkalakh’.

Ibn Talkalakh is also a Syrian activist who has recently come out of prison.

“When the people of Deraa moved I thought ‘that’s it!’ we have to do something.”

“It was very difficult in the beginning. People were scared. The tanks came and they started shooting everywhere and destroying homes. They were arresting people who went out to demonstrate and they came for me.”

“It was my brother and I in the house and from the moment they (the security forces) came in they did not stop beating us. They beat us with electric batons and tied our hands behind our backs and made us kneel in front of them, insulting us the whole time.”

“They blindfolded me and took to prison. They put me in a small cell. We were about 50 people in that cell, it was so crowded.”

Ibn Talkalkh was in prison for 20 days and says he was regularly beaten and tortured.

“Once they beat me so hard on the back of my head blood filled my eyes, I couldn’t see anything. When they interrogated me they would tie my wrists and leave me hanging for hours.”

He shows me the marks on his wrists.

“They put me in a room where I could hear others being tortured. I’d hear their screams, their pleas and it would fill me with fear.”

“I’ll never forget, during one interrogation, I was hanging with hands tied up and the interrogator came up to me and said: ‘Listen boy, it is Bashar al-Assad or no-one. We’ll never hand Syria over to you.'”

Yet despite the horrific time that Ibn Talkalakh had while in prison he tells me that he also found it inspiring.

“I met so many people with a much stronger will than mine. I met people from all walks of life – doctors, farmers, lawyers – many people who are willing to go out and take to the streets and keep asking for our rights even if it meant going to prison again.”

“It filled me with hope that justice will come and that this regime will fall. It made me more determined to come out and keep fighting.”

These interviews were conducted in Wadi Khaled on the Lebanon-Syria border on 16-17th June 2011. The BBC cannot verify the authenticity of these testimonies.

The “Half-men” respond to the Boy-king

Nov 12

Posted by OFF THE WALL

In 2006, and during the Israeli war on Lebanon, Bashar Al-Assad, claiming leadership of the Arab resistance camp, and using the popularity of Hizbullah’s struggle against Israel to burnish his own image, called Arab leaders “half-men”. Whether that was on the minds of the 18 foreign ministers who voted yes for the suspension of the participation of the Syrian delegation in all of the league’s activities and meetings remain to be found by those who write books of political intrigue and personalities. For now, it is clear that the Syrian regime thought that its policy makers are smarter than the “Bedouins” and has underestimated their resolve and intelligence.

The Chair of the meeting today, Qatar’s foreign minister outlined the decision in 7 points. Here they are in Arabic, then in English:

نص البيان

أولا :نظرا لعدم التزام سوريا بالتنفيذ الكامل والفوري للمبادرة العربية قررنا تعليق مشاركة الوفود السورية في انشطة الجامعة العربية لحين تنفيذ دمشق المبادرة العربية.

ثانيا: توفير الحماية للمدنيين السوريين بالاتصال الفوري
بالمنظمات المعنية بما فيها الأمم المتحدة ، في حين عدم توقف اعمال العنف والقتل.

ثالثا: دعوة الجيش العربي السوري للامتناع عن التورط في اعمال القتل والعنف ضد المدنيين.

رابعا: توقيع عقوبات اجتماعية واقتصادية على الحكومة السورية
في حال عدم الالتزام.

خامسا: دعوة دول الجامعة العربية لسحب سفرائها من دمشق ، مع الاخذ في الاعتبار ان هذا القرار سيادي.

سادسا: دعوة جميع اطراف المعارضة للاجتماع في مقر الجامعة خلال 3 أيام للاتفاق على رؤية موحدة لمرحلة انتقالية في سوريا ، ويقرر ما يراه مناسب للاعتراف بالمعارضة السورية.

سابعا: بقاء المجلس الوزاري العربي في حالة انعقاد دائم لحين متابعة الموقف.

Text of the Statement from the Arab League Ministerial Committee

  • First: Due to lack of commitment from Syria to the full and immediate implementation of the initiative, we have decided to suspend the participation of Syrian Arab delegations in the activities of the Arab League until  Damascus implements the Arab initiative
  • Second: Provide protection to Syrian civilians through the prompt contact with relevant organization including the United Nations as long as there is no halt to violence and murder
  • Third: Call on the Syrian Arab Army to abstain from being involved in the killing and violence against civilians
  • Fourth: Initiate social and economic punitive measures against the Syrian government in case of lack of commitment
  • Fifth: Calls on all Member States of the Arab League to withdraw their Ambassadors from Damascus, while remaining cognizant that this is a sovereign decision.
  • Sixth: Call on all sides of the opposition to meet in the League’s headquarters within three days to agree on a unified vision for a transition phase in Syria and for the council to decide on what it sees as appropriate in the matter of recognition of the Syrian opposition .
  • Seventh: Maintain the Ministerial Council in permanent session to follow up on the situation.

Some of my own thinking about the 7 items:

First: Due to lack of compliance from Syria to the full and immediate implementation of the initiative, we have decided to suspend the participation of Arab delegations in the activities of the Arab League until the Damascus implements the Arab initiative

While this is not a suspension of Syria’s membership in the League, it is still significant step. In addition, the Arab league here puts the blame squarely in the regime’s court. It is Assad’s regime who failed, willingly to comply with the league’s initiative, even after it was modified to address the regime’s request. The league also indicates that its members consider the statement delivered earlier by the Assad’s ambassador to the league as disingenuous attempt at gaining more time and they said no.

Second: Provide protection to Syrian civilians through the prompt contact with relevant organization including the United Nations as long as there is no halt to violence and murder

This is a very important item. It is the mechanism through which the architects of the AL initiative hope to regain momentum in the UN for the Syrian issue after the Russian and Chinese block. They now have mandate from the AL to bring Syria’s non-compliance with an initiative it signed on to UN Security Council.  The Russian and Chinese Ambassadors to the UNSC will now be in a bind, especially after their own governments have called on Syria to start implementing real reform and to put an end to the bloodshed nearly two months ago after the first attempt at UNSC. What will be the outcome at the UNSC is still undetermined and it will depend a lot on the outcome of other steps in this recent decision by the Arab League.

Third: Call on the Syrian Arab Army to reject being involved in the killing and violence against civilians

I did not expect this one. It came as a surprise and an incredible moral boost. It is a direct call by the Arab league to the Syrian Army to revolt against the thugs who are forcing its members to become involved in the killing of their own country people. It is also a warning that soldiers and officers engaged in such murders will be liable in the future.  This is a call for disobedience that will resonate and should be used to the hilt by the opposition.  However, I would caution against this call being considered a recognition by the AL of the FSA as a legitimate liberation force. Such will depend again on what the opposition does in the next 72 hours (by now 66 hours).

Fourth: Initiate social and economic punitive measures against the Syrian government in case of lack of commitment

No more invitation for Syrian Ambassadors to receptions held in Arab embassies worldwide. No more direct communication with Assad and his inner circle, and a halt to any investment or development project with increasingly tight economic sanctions. It is likely that an increased scrutiny of bank accounts will ensue and things will get uglier for the regime’s big fishes.

Fifth: Calls on all Member States of the Arab League to withdraw their Ambassadors from Damascus, while remaining cognizant that this is a sovereign decision.

Again, this is a clear call for complete isolation. It is unlikely to be followed by all countries and it may take time to implement, but it also gives impetuous for other countries who are not members of the AL to withdraw their ambassadors in recognition of the legitimacy of the AL. Given the hysteria on Syrian media, I expect that several embassies will soon be closed to protect the staff. Continuing insult of members of the league will accelerate the process. You can count on the Syrian regime, its trumpets, and media, to do the job.

Sixth: Call on all sides of the opposition to meet in the League’s headquarters within three days to agree on a unified vision for a transition phase in Syria and for the council to decide on what it sees as appropriate in the matter of recognition of the Syrian opposition 

This is one huge nail in the regime’s coffin. It is also the most serious challenge to the opposition. Some elements in the internal opposition will now face a new reality. If they want to claim legitimacy as part of the opposition, they will have to work within the framework now adopted by the league including the possibility of UNSC decision, and the clear admonition of Assad’s army. No longer can some play both sides since the AL has defined the parameters. The dialog is now defined as being a dialog within the opposition to identify a unified vision for the inevitable transition phase, which does not include the regime in the discussion. The league’s ministers probably intentionally put in a very short time to force the opposition into the table without allowing for maneuvering and to force them to identify commonality rather than bicker and get into backstabbing deals. This will filter the opposition and force fake opposition into the open where they have to declare their loyalty to the maintenance of this dead man walking regime. Recognition of the opposition by the AL opens doors to recognition by many more countries in waiting.

Seventh: Maintain the Ministerial Council in permanent session to follow up on the situation.

They’ll be watching

For now, we’ll be watching this. Thanks to CSI-HAMA once more.

[youtube http://youtu.be/0S9ATYn28_Y?]

[youtube http://youtu.be/OI7-CcUguUY?]

This Time We Mean It: The Arab League Gets Tough on Syria

By RANIA ABOUZEID / BEIRUT Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2099360,00.html

Syria appears to have lost its political cover from the Arab world. Damascus, the self-declared beating heart of pan-Arab nationalism, was suspended from the 22-member Arab League on Saturday. It was an unusually bold move by a body not known for achieving consensus or results, especially on the divisive issue of Syria’s handling of its ferocious eight-month-old crackdown on pro-democracy supporters.

In a stronger than expected move, 19 states approved the suspension, which will take effect on Nov. 16, when the League will meet again in Morocco to discuss Syria’s compliance (or lack of) on its latest demands. Iraq abstained, a move some observers interpreted as a measure of Iran’s influence over Baghdad. Iran remains Syria’s staunchest ally in the region, but Saturday’s vote clearly shows that both Tehran and Damascus have become pariahs in their neighborhood. Yemen, battling its own pro-democracy movement, objected to the suspension, as did Syria’s smaller, weaker neighbor Lebanon, which shook off Damascus’ 29-year occupation back in 2005, but now appears to be firmly back in Syria’s grip.
(See pictures of Syria’s ongoing bloody protests.)

The League also decided to impose political and economic sanctions against Damascus, and urged its member states to withdraw their ambassadors from the Syrian capital in protest. “Syria is a dear country for all of us and it pains us to make this decision,” Qatari Foreign Minister Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani told a news conference at the League headquarters in Cairo. “We hope there will be a brave move from Syria to stop the violence and begin a real dialogue toward real reform.”

With its surprising decisiveness, the league managed to repair a measure of its credibility, badly damaged after Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had made a mockery out of a supposed agreement with the League announced just 10 days ago. Under the terms of that deal, Assad was supposed to withdraw his security forces from Syria’s besieged cities, stop violence, free all political detainees, hold a national dialogue with the Syrian opposition within two weeks, and to allow media, the Arab League and international monitors access to the closed country. He didn’t do any of that. Instead, more than 100 people were killed in the tormented central city of Homs alone since the “deal” was announced on Nov. 2, according to a Human Rights Watch report issued this week. HRW has accused the Syrian regime of committing crimes against humanity in Homs. Syria will be excluded from the pan-Arab body until it implements the terms of this earlier agreement.

“We were criticized for taking a long time but this was out of our concern for Syria,” Qatari Foreign Minister Thani said of the perceived foot-dragging on censuring Syria. “We needed to have a majority to approve those decisions.” The concern, of course, is that instability in Syria, particularly of a sectarian nature, could surge across its borders and ignite similar sectarian conflict in the patchwork societies of Iraq and Lebanon as well as foment trouble in Jordan and Israel, perhaps through Syria’s militant allies, the Lebanese group Hizballah and the Palestinian Hamas organization.

Still, despite these fears, Arab League Secretary General Nabil Araby suggested that the body had run out of patience with Assad. “The Arab League started asking Syria four months ago to stop this killing, but without a response,” he said, later adding that “Assad can stop the killing in four days, we’ve been asking him to do so for four months.”

Predictably, Syria’s representative to the Arab League, Youssef al-Ahmad, slammed the body’s “illegal” decision, describing it as a violation of its charter and an indication that it served a Western and U.S agenda, the state-run Syrian news agency reported. In an undiplomatic moment, he also allegedly called Araby and Thani “pigs and traitors,” according to Arabic satellite channels.

Name-calling and finger pointing aside, the question is what happens next? The Qatari foreign minister urged Syria’s fragmented opposition to meet in Cairo over the next three days “to discuss how they can have one opinion.” The Syrian National Council (SNC) was recently formed as an umbrella organization, but it has been marred by infighting and breakaways. Although the SNC has yet to be recognized by most states (apart from Libya’s new leaders), the Arab League went further than it has gone before in anointing the Syrian opposition council as the legitimate representatives of the opposition.

“This is if everything goes okay,” Thani added. “If the killing stops. But if the killing doesn’t stop, we have to come back and see where we are going.” That may include seeking assistance from the United Nations to help rein in Assad, a move that could echo international military action against Libya’s Colonel Muammar Gadhafi. But once again, the League shied away from the specifics, although Thani stressed that arming the Syrian opposition was not on the table — for now. “Nobody in the League is talking about arming [the opposition], or creating a no-fly zone. Not one member mentioned these. The mechanisms will be considered on the 16th.” Will the international community — specifically Russia and China, which have prevented a U.N resolution against Syria — now take cues from the Arab League and move more firmly against Assad? That remains to be seen. But one thing is definitely clear: the Arab deadlines are becoming shorter. Syria’s Baathist regime — which has been in power for five decades — now has four days to act.

Funny… from @yuhaa ‘l-Lubnaniyoun: The Zu`ama Discover Twitter…

source

Syria’s Options for the Future

Abdel Bari Atwan


8 November 2011

The Syrian opposition, the Transitional National Council TNC), described the Arab League’s initiative to stop the bloodshed in Syria as a “lifeline” to save the regime and an attempt to prolong its life in power. However, the opposition’s assessments were absolutely incorrect, not because the Syrian regime aborted this initiative only one day after it was launched when the regime failed to comply with any of its provisions, but because the Arab states that stand behind the initiative did not want it to succeed in the first place because they already know that the prospects of the regime truly implementing the initiative are extremely limited if not non-existent.

The US Administration showed then burned the Arabs’ cards early on when it urged armed Syrians not to respond to the Syrian regime’s decree that they will be granted amnesty as soon as they hand over their weapons. Spokesmen for the regime used this move as an evidence of a flagrant US intervention in Syrian internal affairs.

The Syrian armed men had no intention of handing over these weapons and, therefore, did not need this “stupid” US advice in the first place because they held up these weapons against the regime and its forces not in order to give them up but rather to exhaust the regime through a war that will eventually lead to its downfall.

Yesterday, the TNC renewed its calls for the establishment of a buffer zone to be overseen and protected by international peacekeepers. This came after the storming of the Homs area by Syrian tanks and the use of large-caliber artillery in an initial simulation of the Libyan model. This might widen the increasing chasm between the opposition at home and abroad.

The real test for the Arab League will be clearly evident during its meeting on Saturday [12 November], which is expected to be held at the level of foreign ministers. After the Syrian regime was openly accused of foiling the Arab initiative, many people expect the ministers to take punitive measures. Most expectations refer to several steps in this regard, and they can be summed up in the following:

First: Lifting the legitimate cover on the Syrian regime and recognition by some or most of the [Arab] states of the transitional national council as representative of the Syrian people, following the example of the Libyan council (Only Libya recognized this council);

Second: Support for the establishment of no-fly zones or protected regional or international areas (buffer zones) to be used by the armed forces that are opposed to the regime and which had defected from the army as bases to launch attacks to undermine the regime’s security and stability; and

Third: Tightening the economic blockade by neighbouring states in order to tighten the noose around the middle class that consists of senior traders. This class, which mostly centres in the cities of Aleppo and Damascus, continues to support the regime or at least stands in the middle at best, awaiting the situation to be settled in favour of the regime or the opposition.

It is difficult to predict whether the Arab foreign ministers will unilaterally or collectively take steps such as these at their upcoming meeting. However, given the increasing talk in Israel and the United States on an imminent military strike against Iran to destroy its nuclear facilities, such steps appear to be mostly likely.

The Syrian issue began to enter a phase of political and military tension, coinciding with toned-up threats against Iran. Perhaps, it is not a coincidence for the upcoming meeting of the Arab foreign ministers to be held only two days after the issuance of the IAEA report, which is expected to denounce Iran and level charges at it, coupled with evidence, that it is involved in a nuclear military programme at a secret facility in a mountain in the Qom area, as documented Western reports indicated.

Militarization of the Syrian uprising might be the most important step in the Arabs’ official response to the regime on the grounds that the Arab initiative was not implemented. What will make this step easy is the fact that Syria is surrounded by “hostile” states, such as Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon, in addition to a border strip to the west of Iraq where a Sunni majority harbours fierce enmity towards Iran and the pro-Iran Baghdad government.

We do not know whether foreign intervention in Syria will precede or follow the expected air and missile strikes against Iran. However, what can be learned is that the entire region will see a sectarian Sunni-Shi’i division that might be translated into civil wars not only in Syria but also in most countries in the Arab east, particularly in Iraq, Lebanon, and some Gulf states.

Some officials in the Gulf Region talk at their private meetings of a new scenario to drop the idea of a foreign military intervention in Syria for the time being and go directly to Iran, “the head of the snake”, because Israel and the US bases in the Gulf might suffer the same losses whether the strike is against Iran or Syria. In both cases, Lebanese Hezbollah will shell Israel, and Iran might intervene militarily to protect its Syria ally if he is subjected to a foreign intervention.

Militarization of the Syrian uprising is not a strategy that will ensure success for the uprising in eventually bringing the regime down, because the Islamic uprising in Algeria that broke out in the early 90s in protest against the cancellation of the results of the free legislative elections, which the Salvation Front won, lasted almost 10 years and led to the death of 200,000 people.

This comparison may not be correct in light of the fact that, unlike Algeria, Syria is surrounded by states that are hostile to its regime. On the other hand, the West did not want the Islamists’ uprising in Algeria to be successful. However, it wants for the Syrian uprising exactly the opposite. This does not mean that we should forget the existence of foreign support, by Russia and China, for the Syrian regime, even though it is difficult to be sure of the seriousness of this support.

Waiting is the only option for any person who analyses the situation in this volatile region of the world that always brings us surprises, as it is difficult to predict developments in this region and their likely consequence. Who had expected the United States to be defeated in Iraq and to withdraw all its forces in humiliation after the loss of $1 trillion and 5,000 soldiers? And who had expected Taleban to return to Afghanistan, launch a bloody war against the US occupation, and force the US Administration to raise a white flag in admission of defeat?

Certainly, there have been US-Western successes in Libya, represented by the overthrow of the Al-Qadhafi regime eight months after intervention by NATO. But did former US President George Bush not declare as a peacock “the mission in Iraq accomplished” three weeks after invading and occupying this country? Who would have believed that Iran, which did not fire one single bullet, would be the main winner in the end?

Syria will definitely face an unknown future involving more bloodshed, and the regime will certainly bear the greater part of responsibility because it thought that security solutions and not making concessions to the people would be the ideal way to emerge from this crisis.

What we fear most is that both the regime and opposition might not find a governable Syria in the end.

The Arabs will be “false witnesses” just as they were in the case of Iraq and Afghanistan or financers of American wars because they cannot oppose the United States and its plans even if these plans contravene their ambitions and interests. The Arabs’ loss will be certain, and the argument is over its magnitude. We are not talking here about financial losses as a lot of trillions are deposited i n Western banks to cover such losses. What is important is the shape of the region and the human losses after a fourth US war in the Middle East in less than 30 years.

Source

The Stream – Foreign workers under threat in Russia

[youtube http://youtu.be/VmgjJiXZlPk?]

Hundreds of poor migrants are dying in Russia. Is that nation’s neo-Nazi movement to blame?

The Stream speaks with Erica Marat, a Central Asia researcher with the Jamestown Foundation, and Madeleine Reeves, a social anthropologist at the University of Manchester.

Syrian Actress on Hunger Strike فدوى سليمان

[youtube http://youtu.be/Yis2GKNNGYc?]

The courageous Syrian actress Fadwa Suleiman, who has led several anti-regime demonstrations in Homs, makes a videotaped plea to her fellow citizens. Below is a translation of the text of her speech:

“General strike Thursday in the city of Homs: Since yesterday, neighborhoods in Homs have been searched by the security forces looking for me. People were beaten to force them to reveal where I was. In case I am arrested by the security forces or the army, it is possible that I will be forced to appear on the Dunia TV station to confess that I am part of a conspiracy against Syria as they have done with the honorable hero, sheikh Ahmad Alsayasen and the (defected) army officer Hussein Harmoush. In case I or any one of my family are harmed in any way, I hold the regime, the army, the security forces and the shabiha (thugs) fully responsible. I declare that I will continue to demonstrate and continue the hunger strike that I started two days ago to prove to all our partners in the nation the lies of the regime about the presence of armed gangs, salafis and Muslim extremists intent on overthrowing the regime and exterminating the minorities. I advise the great people of Syria to continue their peaceful protests until the fall of the regime and they achieve the civil, democratic country that all Syrians dream of. I implore all Syrians to remain unified and stand together until the fall of the regime, the regime that has lost its legitimacy since the constitution was altered to accommodate Bashar Al Assad’s rise to the presidency for no reason other than the fact that he was the son of the previous president. I call on you today and every day to descend to every public square in civil disobedience and to go on hunger strike until the withdrawal of the army and security forces from every city and street and the release of all prisoners of conscience and political prisoners from the jails of oppression. I call on all honorable Syrians everywhere and I call on every human being wherever they are, to support us and to stand in front of our embassies all over the world and to declare their intent to go on hunger strike in solidarity with the right of all people to freely choose their own government without fear of losing their life. Oh free people of Damascus, free people of Barzeh and Quaboon and Midan, the free people of Douma and Kadam and Muadamieh and Harasta and Irbeen and Riknideen and Zabadani. Oh free people of Daraa and Baniyas and Latakia and Tartous. Oh free people of Hama and Aleppo and Idlib and Bukamal and Deir Elzor and Raqqah and Quamishli and Hasakeh. I call upon you to declare your civil disobedience and go on hunger strike in all public squares and streets in solidarity with the prisoners of the central prison of Homs who are themselves on hunger strike and to lift the siege off the neighborhood of Baba Amr that has been subjected to continuous shelling with heavy machine guns and artillery for the past week and that has been isolated from the world. No one knows what is going on inside Baba Amr. Baba Amr is being subjected to a real humanitarian disaster. Stand with them because no street, neighborhood or city in Syria is immune to what is happening in Baba Amr. As the Arab League continues to set one deadline after another, the regime continues to oppress the people of Syria, robbing them of their dignity, their freedom and their life.

And peace, all the peace for Syria and it people.
And peace, all the peace for Syria and it people. 
 And peace, all the peace for Syria and it people.

Thursday of the General Strike, Homs, 11/10/2011.”

(Translation: Abu Kareem)

source

A Road to Mecca

More than 80 years ago, one man crossed the frontline between the Muslim world and the West – we retrace his journey.
Al Jazeera World Last Modified: 09 Nov 2011 07:32
[youtube http://youtu.be/pCCnggr5jh8?]
See whole film here :

In A Road to Mecca, filmmaker George Misch sets out to explore the frontline between the Muslim world and the West. His guide for this journey is a man from the past – somebody who, 80 years earlier, crossed all boundaries between countries, cultures and religions.

Leopold Weiss was born a Jew on the edge of the former Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1900. But his story would unfold far away in the deserts of Arabia.

Feeling restless and unhappy in Europe, in 1922 Weiss accepted an uncle’s invitation to join him in Jerusalem. But what began as a family visit soon turned into a life-changing journey.

Weiss enjoyed the hospitality of the Arabs he met in the Middle East and was enchanted by their lifestyle. With the passion of an explorer, he began to travel across the region.

His travels and encounters nurtured in him a sense that Zionism was causing a great injustice to the Palestinian Arabs. In Jerusalem, he got into heated arguments with the leaders of the Zionist movement and began to feel at a greater distance from the religion of his ancestors than ever before.

“Islam should be presented without any fanaticism. Without any stress on our having the only possible way and the others are lost. Moderation in all forms is a basic demand of Islam.”Muhammad Asad

As he discovered the Muslims of the Middle East, Weiss also discovered Islam – studying the Quran and finding not only the answer to the spiritual emptiness he had felt but also an alternative to the materialism of Europe’s Roaring Twenties. In Saudi Arabia, Weiss felt truly at home, writing: “I am no longer a stranger.”

In 1926, he converted to Islam and changed his name to Muhammad Asad. Full of enthusiasm, he embarked upon his first pilgrimage to Mecca.

Curious to get to know other Muslim communities, in 1932 Asad left Saudi Arabia – travelling to Turkistan, China and Indonesia. In India, he met poet and philosopher Muhammad Iqbal. Iqbal dreamed of creating a separate Islamic state as a solution to the bloodshed between Indian Muslims and Hindus. Iqbal’s vision of Pakistan quickly became Asad’s own dream.

Asad campaigned for the creation of Pakistan by writing books, giving public lectures and hosting radio programmes. He also drafted the outline for an Islamic constitution in which equal rights for women were secured.

In 1951, Asad became Pakistan’s envoy to the United Nations. But to his dismay he was forced out of the position after just one year. Deeply disappointed, he turned his back on politics, deciding instead to write his autobiography in the hope that it would promote better understanding between Muslims and the West. The Road to Mecca quickly became a bestseller.

By 1970, Asad had grown increasingly concerned that the Quran was being misinterpreted and misused for political goals. This motivated him to undertake his biggest challenge: a new translation of and commentary on the Quran. He settled in Morocco and estimated that it would take him four years to complete. Seventeen years later it was finished. He dedicated it to “people who think”.

“Every age requires a new approach to the Quran for the simple reason that the Quran is made for all ages. It is our duty to look for deeper meanings in the Quran in order to increase our knowledge and experience. The Quran wants your intellect to be always active and trying to approach the message of God. God himself dedicated this book to people who think.”Muhammad Asad

Despite the fact that Asad today has a loyal following among those who share an interest in his writings and an intellectual affiliation with him, his translation was not embraced by all. Rumour has it that there were even book burnings of Asad’s Quran.

Emotionally and financially exhausted, he withdrew to Europe – settling in Spain in 1987. He planned to revise his translation once more but old age and prolonged illness prevented him from completing it. On February 20, 1992, he died, alone and secluded.

A Road to Mecca can be seen from Tuesday, November 8, at the following times GMT: Tuesday: 2000; Wednesday: 1200; Thursday: 0100; Friday: 0600; Saturday: 2000; Sunday: 1200; Monday: 0100.

Irish Gaza activists to return home

An image released by the Israel Defence Forces shows Israeli soldiers boarding the Irish vessel the MV 'Saoirse', which was carrying activists towards Gaza.An image released by the Israel Defence Forces shows Israeli soldiers boarding the Irish vessel the MV ‘Saoirse’, which was carrying activists towards Gaza.

IRISH TIMES REPORTERS

The remaining nine Irish citizens detained after they tried to breach Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza over a week ago are due to return to Ireland today.

Five of the 14 flew into Dublin airport late yesterday after earlier failing to make a British Airways flight they were scheduled to travel on.

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Eamon Gilmore said today he had some concerns around aspects of the activists’ detention and said he would follow this up with the Israeli authorities once all 14 had returned to Ireland.

The Irish embassy in Tel Aviv yesterday lodged two “firm protests” with the Israeli authorities over the treatment of Irish activists who missed two planned flights due to what the Israelis claimed were security procedures.

The Israeli embassy claimed the airline took a decision not to allow all seven on board. “The reasons for this decision are unknown to us, and must be sought from British Airways,” a statement from the embassy said.

A spokesman for British Airways, however, said the airline was due to carry only two deportees at the request of the Israeli authorities. He said those two arrived at the aircraft too late to make the flight.

Arrangements were then made for all seven to travel on a Lufthansa flight later yesterday afternoon.

Irish diplomats present at the airport, including Ambassador Breifne O’Reilly, made repeated requests to be allowed accompany the activists to the aircraft but these were declined by the Israeli authorities.

In the end, all but two of the seven activists, campaign co-ordinator Fintan Lane and university lecturer Zoe Lawlor, were allowed board the Lufthansa aircraft.

The Israeli embassy refused to provide an explanation for why Mr Lane and Ms Lawlor were prevented from boarding the flight, saying it could not refer to “the events which took place at Ben Gurion airport this afternoon because it has to do with security matters.”

It also blamed the activists for their predicament.

“Since the whole \[flotilla] episode was a mere provocation, then it is obviously in the interest of the participants – and certainly not in the interest of Israel – to prolong it as much as they can,” the embassy said in a statement.

“We can only express our earnest hope that these people leave Israeli soil as quickly as possible.” The Irish Ship to Gaza campaign branded what transpired at the airport “bizarre and cruel” and Irish diplomats privately expressed frustration.

Mr Lane and Ms Lawlor eventually succeeded in boarding a Turkish Airlines flight to Istanbul yesterday evening and are expected home today.

The remaining seven activists, including Socialist MEP Paul Murphy flew out of Israel on an El Al flight today.

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZbEawYPnkQ&feature=colike?]

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑